All Inbox articles 鈥� Page 2
-
Comment
The big questions
Readers share their respects for construction industry giant Sir Frank Lampl, who died last week, as well as pondering the nuclear debate and media coverage of unrest in the Middle East
-
Comment
A pollution solution?
Excel Industries is concerned that the consultation on the Code for Sustainable Homes and the energy efficiency standard for zero-carbon homes makes no apparent reference to a review of Category 6 - pollution
-
Comment
It's a gas
In regard to your article on the Passivhaus and Decent Homes refurbishments (11 February, page 50) should we expect that only empty properties will be upgraded?
-
Comment
Covered up
Regarding the article 鈥淪potlight now on OFT to defend five-year investigation鈥� (11 March, building.co.uk) I鈥檓 not quite sure how cover pricing could affect the best price for the job. It would require all but one of the bidders to be seeking a cover price, the likelihood of which is very ...
-
Comment
Missing digits
As the owner of a late Victorian semi-detached house in a conservation zone I have been reading Robert Prewett鈥檚 Passivhaus Diaries, regarding the conversion of 64 Midmoor Road to a low-energy building, with great interest (4 March, page 42)
-
Comment
Those who dare ...
Reflecting on Richard Saxon鈥檚 letter (Inbox, 11 March), and Rob Charlton鈥檚 original thoughts (25 February, page 33), they have identified one of our industry鈥檚 core problems - too much functional focus and segregation on a project.
-
Comment
Welcome to Cheapsville
Regarding the story Shapps calls for end to 鈥淟egoland鈥� homes, (9 March, www.building.co.uk) it is the planners who are failing in their duty to ensure appropriate local design.
-
CommentYou only live twice
Painting large areas can get tedious, so these two workers have decided to do it in true 007 style 鈥� teetering on a tiny ledge and leaning precariously over a drop.
-
Comment
Inbox: Perfect Casting
锘縏his week, readers assign leading roles to the overlooked Construction Industry Council; adjudicators experienced in the art of delay and disruption disputes; and architects with business nous
-
Comment
Ode to Quentin
Your satirical feature, The Trials of Quentin Shears continues to be the first thing I turn to in your magazine, as it is so witty and well observed.
-
Comment
Don't pass the buck
Regarding the article, 鈥淐an subbies survive on less?鈥� (18 February, page 20) I believe that there are significant sums that can be taken off construction project costs
-
Comment
Water works
In your article about the new station over the river at Blackfriars (28 January, page 44), you refer to the role of the PLA in making the use of the river a possibility for moving materials to and from the site.
-
Comment
Let's not be hasty
Unfortunately the knee-jerk reaction to a crisis described in 鈥淩ok and Connaught force repairs in-house鈥� (11 February, page 12), is typical of housing associations, and is driving the provision of an in-house repairs team.
-
Comment
Use your common sense
I found Alan Harris鈥� concerns that adjudicators rarely seek advice from specialists on matters of law or programming interesting (11 February, page 25).
-
Comment
Keep the receipts
If the government is concerned that they are overpaying for the services supplied by major contractors (building.co.uk, 9 February), a good start would be to investigate the legality of the bulk order discounts that are obtained from suppliers.
-
Comment
Credit where it's due
Your leading article on the rebuilding of Blackfriars station (28 January, page 44), was both interesting and informative.
-
Comment
Budget for buildings
The Scottish budget deal agreed by MSPs this week is not the budget for recovery that the building industry has been crying out for
-
Comment
Legal dispute
It is interesting to read Ann Minogue鈥檚 鈥淐an we be of any assistance?鈥� (21 January, page 49). Minogue picks up on the point that adjudicators rarely appoint lawyers to advise on the law.
-
Comment
Designed to fail
Rudi Klein (28 January, page 53) writes about the problems caused by a lack of risk management during the design process. Could such problems have also been compounded by the apparent demise of the bill of quantities?