City of London officials recommend approval for 鈥榖old and striking鈥 tourist attraction

Foster + Partners鈥 controversial Tulip tourist attraction is being recommended for approval 鈥 despite objections over its impact on the grade I-listed Tower of London and the City of London鈥檚 narrow streets.

Papers published ahead of next week鈥檚 meeting of the City of London鈥檚 planning and transportation committee urge the corporation鈥檚 decision makers to approve the 305m scheme, arguing that its advantages outweigh its impacts and that its 鈥渂old and striking鈥 design is iconic.

In addition to Historic England, Tower of London manager Historic Royal Palaces, the mayor of London Sadiq Khan, the Bevis Marks Synagogue and Tower Hamlets council have voiced concerns over the tower 鈥 which is earmarked for a site next to the architect鈥檚 Gherkin and expected to attract 1.2m visitors a year.

The City鈥檚 own built environment team raised concerns about the scheme鈥檚 impact at ground level in particular its entrance pavilion鈥檚 ability to handle the number of people queuing to make use of its 12 floors of visitor attractions, which include bars, restaurants and revolving 鈥減ods鈥.

DBOX_Foster + Partners_The Tulip_Education_Kids

Source: DBOX for Foster + Partners

The scheme includes an education centre aimed at London schoolchildren

But in a 152-page report, planning officers said they believed that while the proposals 鈥 created for the billionaire Gherkin owner Jacob J Safra 鈥 would breach some City of London planning policies, they would cause 鈥渓ess than substantial harm鈥 to the setting of the Tower of London.

Harm judged 鈥渓ess than substantial鈥 is an important consideration in the government鈥檚 National Planning Policy Framework.

鈥淰irtually no major development proposal is in complete compliance with all policies and in arriving at a decision it is necessary to assess all the policies and proposals in the plan and to come to a view as to whether in the light of the whole plan the proposal does or does not accord with it,鈥 officers said.

Recommending the Tulip for approval, they said Fosters鈥 design was 鈥渉ighly unusual and unique within the UK context鈥 meaning that the tower had 鈥渢he potential to become an architectural icon for the City, London and the UK鈥, and further afield.

鈥淭he proposed architectural approach is bold and striking. Its aesthetic inspiration derives from the Gherkin and the proposal seeks to achieve a familial synergy with the Gherkin,鈥 officers said.

They added: 鈥淟ondon is inherently an innovative and ever-changing City. The Tulip as an architectural expression could continue this tradition of accommodating unconventional and eye-catching landmarks on the skyline, although this needs to be balanced against its impact on other historical landmarks.鈥

Last month, the chair of the City鈥檚 planning and transportation committee Chris Hayward told 好色先生TV he expected that any decision to approve the Tulip would be called in for further scrutiny at a public inquiry presided over by a planning inspector.

Other firms working on the plans include Gherkin builder Skanska and consultant Alinea.

The City鈥檚 planning and transportation committee meets to determine the Tulip proposal at 10.30 am on 2 April.