好色先生TV

The use of 好色先生TV Information Modelling will be made mandatory on virtually all government projects within five years, according to Paul Morrell, the government鈥檚 chief construction adviser.

A report by the Innovation and Growth Team last year, which recommended BIM being used on projects over 拢50m, was dismissed by Morrell as 鈥渦nambitious鈥�.

He said the only exceptions would be when using BIM made the project more expensive. He said: 鈥淲ithin five years, all government procurement will be within 3D collaborative BIM, with specific exceptions where the cost might exceed the benefit, although I have to say I鈥檓 struggling to think of obvious examples of that.鈥�

BIM requires firms to conform to a set of standard processes and 3D modelling of projects. A formal announcement on the five-year roll-out of BIM will be made by the government in June.

The move to widen the net below 拢50m projects to catch all firms working for the government marks a radical departure from previous government thinking.

At the KBB conference in London on Tuesday, run by 好色先生TV鈥檚 parent company UBM, Morrell said: 鈥淭here鈥檚 no lower limit.鈥�

He said: 鈥淚t will lead to integration, which is our biggest problem. I鈥檓 talking to the private sector and asking: 鈥橧f this works for us, will this work for you?鈥欌��

He said he envisaged introducing BIM progressively, with the bar raised at yearly intervals, so a certain standard will be required at year one, a higher standard the following year, and so on - until, within five years, all government procurement will be within 3D collaborative BIM.

Gary Rawlings, a partner at architecture practice Make, said that the firm鈥檚 experience with BIM had generally been 鈥減ositive鈥� and that there was little cost to adopting it.

鈥淭here鈥檚 a reasonably shallow learning curve and the cost of it isn鈥檛 particularly burdensome, and we鈥檙e running it on exactly the machines that we always use,鈥� he said.

But David Mathieson, head of public sector at Turner & Townsend, argued that applying BIM to all public sector work would not be appropriate because on some refit work the costs of surveying the building would be too high to justify using the system.

鈥淥n a fit-out or refit job, the cost of getting it on the system might be very high,鈥� and added that this lighter work was typical of most government accommodation projects.