好色先生TV

Ustainability and waste reduction are indelibly linked and any practice that designs to sustainable principles should be looking to minimise waste in all aspects of the design, construction and operation of the buildings it creates,鈥� says Alan Shingler, partner and head of sustainability at architect Sheppard Robson.

Waste management is an issue that Sheppard Robson tackles as part of its overall sustainability brief 鈥� a standard matrix that clients are asked to fill in at the start of every new project.

Alan Shingler, Sheppard Robson

鈥淚t works as a guide to find out the level of aspiration on the part of the client,鈥� says Shingler. 鈥淗owever, cost is always an issue and some preferable methods are not always employed because they are currently more expensive than the traditional construction route.鈥�

Recycling and reusing construction materials is an approach that is gaining ground. It saves on resources, cuts waste and can save money. Meanwhile, exponents of offsite construction are proving that factory-built components and building modules are produced to higher standards than site-based methods and they perform to a higher level of efficiency once installed. This all makes a lot of sense, so why has it not become the norm?

鈥淔or modern methods of construction and waste minimisation to truly work you need to have full client understanding and buy-in,鈥� says Shingler. 鈥淭hey have to want these new goals to be the driving force behind a project from the absolute outset. These things cannot be an afterthought.鈥�

Turning the tide In early 2008 WRAP approached Sheppard Robson through Davis Langdon to take part in an exercise to design out waste in construction.
Estelle Herszenhorn, project manager at WRAP, explains: 鈥淲RAP identified that working with building designers would be beneficial to its goal of reducing waste in construction because that is where the initial decisions are made.

If we can influence the design to utilise less wasteful materials and methods, then the goal of halving construction waste to landfill by 2012 will be much more achievable.鈥�

WRAP is seeking architects and schemes that it can work with to address the issue of designing out waste. Sheppard Robson and Foster + Partners have already become involved, and the firm will soon begin an alliance with Aedas.

The exercise involves the cost consultant collaborating with architects on live projects to brainstorm the best materials, methods, products and systems to reduce waste at all points in the design and construction process, from component manufacture right through to operation of the building.

鈥淭he aim is to go in at the early stages of a project, ideally stage C or before, and engage the design team to see how we can reduce waste through good design,鈥� says Herszenhorn . 鈥淥ur goal is to produce exemplars that show how a project can be designed with less impact: less cost, less waste and a reduction in carbon footprint.鈥�

University challenge

Sheppard Robson put forward two buildings on the same site for analysis 鈥� the new, 7,000m2 mathematics building and 12,000m2 biosciences building at the University of Bristol.

David Ola, Sheppard Robson project leader, says: 鈥淭he exercise is really interesting. We are evaluating structural concrete flooring methods; the inclusion of a green roof; facade systems; and the effects of designing to regular plan form and standardised sizes, as opposed to non-plan form such as the circular maths building.鈥�

The team has assessed the pros and cons of these elements of the design and come up with results that categorise methods as having a high or low impact on the project in terms of design, cost or other implications. For instance, unitised and stick systems of curtain walling were assessed. Stick systems are common and versatile as they can be used on all types of building, which makes for a competitive market, while unitised systems are less common and more complex and so could be more costly. However, stick systems require scaffolding for installation and this involves more time, labour and embodied energy than the quick mechanical installation of a unitised system.

鈥淥ur brainstorming was really beneficial,鈥� says Alex Amato, associate at Davis Langdon, who facilitated the process. 鈥淭here were obvious answers. For instance, the green roof did reduce the requirement for run-off drainage and the removal of waste, such as spoil, by not having to dig such big grey-water retention tanks. But it was more costly and time-consuming to install.

鈥淎spects such as designing to regular plan form revealed that ceiling and floor tiles should be designed as small grids rather than large because this produces fewer offcuts. And although that is of little consequence on a small job, it soon builds up to be a large waste factor on larger buildings.鈥�

The process has thrown up good ideas for waste-saving measures. Sheppard Robson is in the process of reappraising its designs for the University of Bristol following initial consultation with the local planning authority. Together with the client, it is looking at integrating aspects of the waste management analysis findings.

Ola says: 鈥淭he evaluation of waste trains the architect and the quantity surveyor to analyse the design in a different way. Traditionally, the QS has come at the project from a cost per metre squared approach. Now, if clients can see the savings that can be made through speed of construction, minimisation of waste or the reduction in requirements such as scaffolding, it will give the architect more licence to design innovatively.鈥�

WRAP also used Davis Langdon鈥檚 work with Foster + Partners, which focuses on the medical sector. The practice is part of a framework of architects designing private hospitals for client Circle. Here, Amato explains, the waste study will focus on:

• The potential of different types of prefabricated bedroom units
• The rationalisation of design, best-practice installation and recycling of plasterboard
• Reuse of materials found on site, from replanting of trees to the reuse of spoil on site or as a viable commodity for other projects. Results are expected soon.
• Amato says Davis Langdon will draw on its work with these architects to promote better practice in four main areas of critical engagement:
• Reuse of construction products and materials created in the construction process, such as recycling steel frames or redirecting spoil.
• Designing for deconstruction and addressing the design life of buildings 鈥� 鈥淲e want to encourage greater use of off-site manufacture,鈥� says Amato.
• Dimensional consideration in design, which needs to be addressed to lessen material waste.
• A better understanding of where waste occurs, setting targets for its reduction.

The next steps

Industry has its work cut out helping clients and contractors, both large and small, to halve construction waste to landfill by 2012, but this move to address the problem in the early stages is a step in the right direction.

WRAP will publish guidelines based on the findings of the Davis Langdon work and, using case studies, it aims to have an impact throughout the industry. The initial intention is that public projects such as 好色先生TV Schools for the Future and the NHS鈥檚 Procure 21 take the lead in implementing waste-reduction measures. PFI is another area where savings in both construction and building operation are paramount.

With the Olympics drawing near any means of reducing waste and minimising cost will be welcomed by the government and the London mayor.

Shingler sees this latest initiative as a new dawn in the fight to reduce waste in construction. 鈥淲RAP has traditionally worked with contractors on site. Now, by addressing the problem at the design stage, we are developing a truly holistic methodology. At Sheppard Robson we get involved in projects like this to learn how to better design buildings that are wholly more sustainable. But we also do it because, as a large practice, we have the responsibility to create and share knowledge with the industry. This work with WRAP is the foundation for real joined-up design on a large scale.鈥�