好色先生TV

Ever eager to be of service to the construction industry, 好色先生TV decided to give a group from consultant WSP a break from the office and take them to the cinema.

With sustainability high on the industry鈥檚 agenda, we wondered what they would think of An Inconvenient Truth, the film documenting the crusade of former US vice-president Al Gore to challenge the myths surrounding climate change and to halt the progression of global warming.

After sitting through the 100-minute movie, the team settles in the cinema bar. There are some general mutterings of approval until Azra Hussain, personal assistant to Kamran Moazami, WSP鈥檚 UK managing director of high-rise buildings, admits she was sceptical about Gore鈥檚 motivation. 鈥淲hen it started, I wasn鈥檛 quite sure whether to believe him because he鈥檚 a politician,鈥� she says.

The film opens with Gore introducing himself to a live audience. 鈥淢y name鈥檚 Al Gore. I used to be the next president of the United States of America,鈥� he says, with heavy irony that sends a knowing laugh around the cinema.

Since his controversial defeat by George W Bush in the 2000 election, Gore has dedicated himself to delivering a slide-show revealing what he says is the truth about climate change to audiences around the world. He has given the lecture more than 1000 times. Director Davis Guggenheim鈥檚 movie shows it from beginning to end, interspersed with segments seeking to clarify why and when the son of a tobacco farmer decided to save the planet.

鈥淚 thought, is he really serious about the environment, or is he just trying to get back at the Bush administration?鈥� says Azra. 鈥淭hat was there, but it was very subtle and cleverly done. He never actually comes out and says: 鈥業f I鈥檇 been president, I鈥檇 have made a difference鈥�.鈥�

Stuart Alexander, WSP鈥檚 group technical co-ordinator, believes Gore鈥檚 political past was an asset 鈥� it made the film more watchable: 鈥淵ou can tell he鈥檚 a politician. He鈥檚 a very good lecturer.鈥� He complained, though, about the focus on the former vice-president鈥檚 personal history. 鈥淭here was too much of him. If you had to lose 20% of the film, 19% would have been the personal things. It wasn鈥檛 really necessary.鈥�

Raul Maura, energy director and the environmental expert of the group, admits he was 鈥減leasantly surprised鈥� by Gore鈥檚 grasp of the subject. The lecture, he says, was a sound reflection of the facts. Azra insists there were details missing, however. 鈥淚鈥檇 have been interested to know how he鈥檚 changed his life to help the environment,鈥� she says.

鈥淚t didn鈥檛 touch on that at all.鈥�

The youngest member of the group, graduate Madhumita Nag, has been quiet until this point, but now she pipes up with a comment that strikes a chord with the others.

鈥淚t wasn鈥檛 very well balanced,鈥� she declares. 鈥淎lmost the entire film was saying: 鈥榊es, we鈥檝e got a problem鈥�, but it took too long to explain what can be done to solve it. 鈥�

Azra nods furiously. 鈥淵ou鈥檙e right! How many people are going to sit there until those tips come across the screen during the credits, saying 鈥楧o this鈥�, 鈥楧o that鈥�? I never usually stay for the credits.鈥�

Raul adds: 鈥淚t鈥檚 okay for us because we know those things already, but viewers in the US are more likely not to.鈥�

鈥淭he best thing about that film was that it demonstrates that Americans are, at long last, becoming aware,鈥� says Stuart. 鈥業 think you have to accept it was made for a US audience.鈥�

鈥淗ow many Republicans would watch that film?鈥� Azra wonders. 鈥淭hey wouldn鈥檛 watch it out of principle because it鈥檚 Al Gore.鈥�

During the film, Gore breaks down the myths surrounding climate change and describes how some American officials have tried to cover up scientific discoveries proving global warming.

Raul is inspired: 鈥淚t鈥檚 an excuse, saying sustainability is a burden on the economy. Politicians think in terms of the length of their mandate. If it鈥檚 not happening in the next four or six years, they won鈥檛 do it. Sustainability takes a long time.鈥�

The conversation turns to what WSP as a company does to promote sustainability.

Left to right: Raul, Azra, Madhumita and Stuart

鈥淢aybe people in the construction industry should be made to see this film,鈥� says Raul. 鈥淚t contributes as much as 40% to 50% of energy used 鈥� that includes sourcing and so on.鈥�

鈥淭he actual construction contributes 10%,鈥� adds Madhumita, her civil engineering studies obviously still fresh in her mind.

Now things start getting technical. 鈥淢ost of the graphs Gore used were pretty rigorous, but the solutions were not as simplistic as he pointed out,鈥� says Stuart as he takes out a notepad and pen and demonstrates to the group how one of the graphs featured in the film should have looked.

Madhumita complains that most of the diagrams Gore used lacked reference points. 鈥淭he main graph he used showed a general trend up, but it didn鈥檛 have a single number or unit on there, so you don鈥檛 know whether it鈥檚 going up a lot or just a little bit. He could make it as steep as he wanted.鈥�

As the conversation comes to a close, the WSP team agrees the film was too long. 鈥淭here was a point when I started to nod off,鈥� recalls Azra. 鈥淚 didn鈥檛 want to do that, because I was genuinely interested in the movie.

But I wasn鈥檛 able to apply it to my daily life and it makes me wonder how long I鈥檒l remember it all.鈥�

Despite their reservations, the group all agree that they are happy 好色先生TV took them to the cinema and admit they would not have gone out of their way to see it otherwise.

As they put on their coats to head out into the rain, Madhumita launches into a monologue about some of the points raised earlier. She disagrees with the others鈥� assumption that the Americans are less aware than Europeans 鈥� she studied for a year at MIT in Massachusetts and says she learned most about sustainability there.

She also has more time for the biographical aspects of the film. 鈥淚 actually liked the bits with Al Gore. I think the personal stuff showed you why he was doing it,鈥� she declares. 鈥淟ike the part about his son nearly dying, people can relate to that. It鈥檚 at a time like that you鈥檇 make a conscious decision to do something.鈥�