好色先生TV

With much of central England still reeling from the aftermath of July鈥檚 dreadful floods, the widely-perceived vulnerability of Londoners to similar if not worse levels of inundation receives a regular refueling via the national press. So too does our propensity for continuing to build 鈥� and indeed to buy 鈥� residential property located on floodplains.

The pressure for new homes in the southeast of England is unlikely to abate, and it鈥檚 highly likely that a significant proportion of these will be located on the flood plain of the River Thames. (Indeed many of the brownfield sites the government is so keen to see developers build on are themselves located on floodplains.)

Despite public indignation, previous planning policy guidance on flooding has failed to prevent inappropriate development on floodplains, even in the many areas where ageing sewers and drains already struggle to cope, and where further development threatens to reduce the areas of open land available to soak up excess rainfall and floodwater.

鈥満蒙�先生TV on any floodplain involves risk, and the easiest way to avoid that risk would be to build out of floodplains altogether,鈥� admits Chris Burnham, policy and external relations manager for the Environment Agency鈥檚 Thames Estuary Programme Team.

Burnham adds, however, that the Agency recognises the many factors involved when identifying land for development, such as the need for local housing or jobs: 鈥淚f there is little alternative to building in the flood plain to deliver these other sustainable development objectives, it then comes down to understanding the risks, and developing in such a way that, in the unlikely event of a flood, people are safe and damage to property is reduced.鈥�

In London and the Thames Gateway, Burnham explains, there are already over 1.25 million people living and working in the tidal floodplain. Yet most of this is defended to a standard much higher than that elsewhere in the country.

While the Thames Barrier and associated defences provide what the Environment Agency insists is an 鈥渆xcellent鈥� level of protection against flooding in the estuary, sea levels are continuing to rise, and the scientific consensus is that changing climate will make heavy rainfall and stormy conditions more likely in the future.

鈥淪torm surges can raise water levels in the estuary by as much as a metre,鈥� Burnham explains. And while the probability of surface water or fluvial flooding (it was this type which caused so much devastation in Yorkshire and Gloucestershire earlier in the year) is greater in the Thames estuary than that of tidal storm surges, the consequences of the latter would be far worse 鈥� 鈥淗uge, in fact,鈥� says Burnham, 鈥渢hanks to the volume and speed of water involved鈥�.

Existing development in the Gateway was built without regard to the possibility of a flood, regeneration gives the opportunity to address that

Not surprisingly then, the main purpose of existing protection in the Thames estuary 鈥� which include raised embankments, flood gates and eight barriers, in addition to the Thames Barrier 鈥� is to protect people and property from these storm surges

As so much of the existing development in the Thames Gateway was built without regard to the possibility of a flood, regeneration in the region, says Burnham 鈥済ives us the opportunity for that to be addressed and factored-in from the start 鈥� and it鈥檚 an opportunity we must not miss鈥�.

He goes on to explain how planning and design can help mitigate and manage flood risk, ensuring a development does not face flooding problems, irrespective of climate change: 鈥淔irst of all know the risks; by carrying out a flood risk assessment in a flood risk area you can understand the risk of flooding from all sources 鈥� tidal, freshwater, surface water and sewers.鈥�

By asking questions such as 鈥渨here would the water go if there was a flood?鈥� and 鈥渉ow deep would that be and what would be the impact?鈥�, says Burnham, it is possible to identify whether a site is suitable for a particular use and whether it can be developed in a sustainable way. 鈥淭he most vulnerable areas may be better suited to more flood-compatible use such as landscaped open space, sustainable drainage or car parking,鈥� he adds.

With climate change, Burnham adds, we can expect wetter winters and occasional intense summer rainfall, and this needs to be planned for in the design of both site drainage and layout. 鈥淚ncorporating sustainable drainage systems into site green space, to deal with rainfall run-off can reduce the risk of the existing drainage systems being overloaded and also provide a great feature and habitat for wildlife.鈥�

If a site is adjacent to flood defences, Burnham warns, it is important to understand that some space should be kept clear for maintenance and improvements to these defences. Such open space not only provides improved public access to the river and better views, he says, citing the attractively landscaped area around the dome in Greenwich, but also allows for the modification or replacement of defences 鈥渢o deal with increased risks of flooding due to climate change鈥�.

Burnham urges developers and would-be developers to come and talk to the Environment Agency, before they even start masterplanning: 鈥淔ar too often we receive planning applications which have not considered flood risk, which only causes delays as plans may need to be re-submitted.鈥�

The Agency can help, he adds, 鈥渂oth in advising on the need and scope of flood risk assessments, as well as what you can do to reduce the risks and create a better and safer development鈥�.