Rumour was infrastructure spending would be slashed, thankfully that didn’t happen but everything else looks pretty bad
Due to the pre-briefing and expectation-shaping this autumn statement there was never going to be the surprising cataclysmic event that marked its predecessor. Thank goodness. Mr Hunt said things were going to be bad and sure enough he and the OBR did not pull its punches - it is bad with inflation forecast to average 9.1% this year.
What he did not articulate, however, is that although the economic backdrop was always going to be challenging because of Ukraine, covid and resulting inflation, it has been made so much worse by his party’s choice of selecting Liz Truss as prime minister and Kwasi Kwarteng as the chancellor before him. Due to their aberrations, as far as the global investment community are concerned, the UK is still on the fiscal naughty step.
While many statistics were mentioned, for our sector, there are three numbers which were not referenced by the chancellor or OBR but which I feel present a compelling snapshot of the challenges facing our industry.
First, the annual rate of construction output price growth was 10.1% in the 12 months to September 2022; this has slowed slightly from the record annual price growth in May 2022 (11.5%). In other words construction costs are suffering huge inflationary pressures.
Those creating the built environment have a critical impact on GDP, we employ vast swathes of people, who, when gainfully employed, boost the tax take
Secondly, job vacancies in the construction industry in August to October rose by 10.4% seasonally adjusted to 49,000 from the previous three months, up by 3.6% year on year. Labour is short, hence inflationary pressure brought about by wage hikes is going to continue.
Finally, architects’ workload, a lead indicator of wider building activity, fell by 8% year to year in October, reported in the latest RIBA Future Trends survey. This measure of current workload was the third consecutive month of decline, according to the architects’ professional body. Future expectations are for further declines.
This data is important because those creating the built environment have a critical impact on gross domestic product, we employ vast swathes of people, who, when gainfully employed, boost the tax take and we are larger than car manufacturing and aerospace combined. So what happens to us affects the wider economy.
On the plus side in this statement we did not see the scrapping of energy projects, transport, health-related construction or education in any short term sense and helping with business rates is useful.
But the chancellor failed to give any sort of detail on how the UK’s home owners are going be incentivised to undertake home improvement benefits reducing energy wastage and helping contributing to a net zero carbon society. I know these are big picture aspirations but promoting green initiatives makes sense in terms of reaching sustainability targets as well as saving money on energy, there was an additional £6bn of funding mentioned for a national energy group but no detail.
More coverage of the autumn statement
>> Autumn statement at-a-glance: Tax rises and spending cuts as OBR forecasts recession
>> Infrastructure spared in autumn statement as Hunt commits to £600bn investment
>> Hunt reverses Kwarteng’s ‘permanent’ stamp duty cut from 2025
>> Industry welcomes £6bn funding for energy efficiency measures
It was good to see a commitment to take forward reforms set out in the Skills for Jobs white paper, with its focus on vocational training, and an adviser appointed to maximise their impact, but this is in no way an immediate solution the very real skills crisis firms are grappling with right now. When Brexit cut off a vital supply of labour causing wage inflation why does the chancellor not intervene and pull rank on the chaotic Home Office and allow vital skilled workers to come back from the EU? It does not have to be a binary offering: workers from abroad or UK trained staff. We can have both, increase the labour force and we reduce wage inflation.
This was an autumn statement much postponed and born out of self-created chaos. It was all about the chancellor saying that the pain he introduced was caused by external events and him arguing that it was set against a backdrop of other countries suffering the same issues. He asked that it be seen in the context of creating stability, growth and protecting public services.
For me though, it was more marked by the apparent lack of input from our sector - an industry that has had its ninth construction minister in less than four years and 13th housing minister in the last 10 years. Remember the last election slogan – Build back better? We are still one of the biggest influencers on the UK economy with lion-like impact and a mouse-like presence in the Treasury.
We leave the day with a sigh of relief that it could have been worse and I suspect with all the pre-leaks and spin that is how we were supposed to feel.
Richard Steer, Chair, of Gleeds Worldwide
No comments yet