好色先生TV

The Chartered Surveyors Training Trust has promoted surveying as a career for more than 20 years. But now, with government funding slashed from 拢10,033 to 拢4,850 per trainee, it is fighting for survival.

James Clegg sat in on one of its 鈥榯aster days鈥� at a school in Kent to see why the trust is worth saving.

9.15am 鈥淒oes anyone in the room play Pictionary?鈥� asks Simon Magnus, youth marketing officer, of the Chartered Surveyors Training Trust, to the room full of school students.

He鈥檚 met with either blank faces or eyes lowered to desks. The 17 students, ranging from year 10s to upper sixth, obviously aren鈥檛 quite ready to play. Most are from Bexley business academy, where the taster day is taking place, with a handful from nearby Bexley Heath school. Also present are three surveyors, Andrew Smith and Ed Spencer from EC Harris and Peter Fairbairn from DTZ, along with Shirley Coleman, a cover supervisor from Bexley Heath. Each has been charged with a group of the youngsters.

鈥淎nyone? No?鈥� says Simon, as he starts to hand out sheets of A3 paper and pens. 鈥淵ou won鈥檛 be this quiet by the end of the day鈥︹��

9.25am After 10 minutes of 鈥渢eam ice breaker鈥� exercises, Simon moves the students on to the first task.

Each group has to plan what to do with an empty three-storey property in an up-and-coming area in north London. Taking into account high demand for family homes, they have to decide whether to keep it as a house or convert it into flats.

As the teams get to grips with tape measures and floorplans, and the surveyors introduce them to scale rulers, Simon tells me about the taster days. This is a new initiative 鈥� today is the third taster day the CSTT has held. 鈥淲e鈥檝e been coming into schools for years but we just ended up lecturing people. When do you get experience and chat to someone who鈥檚 part of the profession?鈥�

9.55am Duncan Spalding, headmaster of the business academy, wanders in to see how his charges are doing. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a great networking experience for the youngsters and a good recruitment exercise for the companies,鈥� he says.

10.20am Each group presents their ideas. None has kept the property all in one piece. There are various combinations of flats meticulously planned, except for one group who ran out of time to put the finishing touches to a penthouse. 鈥淲e think the client ran out of money on that,鈥� says Peter Fairbairn.

10.30am Break time. Most of the students shuffle out for comfort breaks. The surveyors seem impressed with the questions they鈥檙e getting about the profession. 鈥淣o one鈥檚 asked what I earn yet though,鈥� says Peter.

10.45am Simon sets the day鈥檚 main task. Each team is now supposed to be a firm of surveyors tendering for a renovation project in south London. Over the course of the day they have to work out what to do with a three-storey property: keep it all as one home? Break it into flats? Tear the whole thing down and start from scratch? As well as trying to make the most attractive offer to the potential clients, they are asked to consider the environmental impact and the effects on the local community.

11.20am The groups look at design and costing. There鈥檚 a list of how much each feature (floor, windows, internal wall and so on) costs to build and how much existing bits will cost to demolish. There鈥檚 also a chart determining resale value based on the number of rooms each property has.

12.10pm Break for lunch.

1pm Simon drills the teams for the final part of the exercise 鈥� presenting their design plans and calculations of cost and profit. Each team will be marked on their presentation.

Black pieces of card are handed out for the teams to start mounting their presentations. But some are still completing their design and costing calculations from before lunch.

Simon explains the thinking behind the task: 鈥淲e chose a residential, rather than a commercial project because everyone has a frame of reference for it. We originally thought about designs for a big Olympic centre or an exercise developing a whole area. But with this they can look at it and think about their home, how maybe that was built the way it is because of some of the reasons we鈥檙e looking at here.鈥�

1.20pm Only 40 minutes to go but all the presentation boards are still blank.

1.42pm Ed鈥檚 group, which seems to be somewhat ahead of the others, have named themselves Bexley Inc. The company鈥檚 claim to fame is that they have worked with big name architects 鈥渓ike Norman Foster鈥� (a reference to the fact that the academy was a Foster design). They also seem to have got slightly distracted by making paper birds to attach to their presentation boards.

2.11pm 鈥淩ight 鈥� meet your clients,鈥� says Simon, gesturing towards Ed, Andrew, Peter and Shirley. 鈥淭he four people who have previously been part of your team are now your completely unbiased clients.鈥�

The four groups take it in turns to go through their presentations. Each one has come up with different designs for what could be done with the property, backed up by cost planning to show how much profit they could bring in for their clients. One team mentions they will ensure a successful tender by offering to undercut all the other groups 鈥�

2.30pm After each group has given their presentations, Simon tells the students about the CSTT bursaries while the four clients consult on how the teams have scored. The winners for the contract are 鈥淚deas Workshop鈥�, previously Shirley鈥檚 group, who promised 鈥渁s much profit as possible without compromising our values of keeping responsibility to the community鈥�.

As the students shuffle out, one of the members of the upper sixth stays behind to talk to Simon. He leaves with an application form for a CSTT bursary. So the CSTT has scored at least one potential convert to the construction industry. Let鈥檚 hope it is still around to support youngsters like him in a few years鈥� time.