Exclusive data and full analysis on the biggest homebuilders in the UK

top 50 housebuilders index

It might not have felt like it at the time, but 2021 was actually a good year to be a housebuilder. That鈥檚 not to say it was easy 鈥 but the numbers in this year鈥檚 Top 50 Housebuilders tables, compiled from the most recent published results of the UK鈥檚 biggest private residential developers, tell a pretty simple story.

Housebuilders in the top 50 saw their turnover increase by an average of more than 25%, taking revenue well above pre-pandemic levels, with operating profit across the firms increasing even faster, by a third. Operating margins, which rose to 11.7% on average, were close to the levels seen pre-covid.

>> Click here to see the full Top 50 Housebuilders 2022 table <<

Of course, given the mini-Budget turmoil and new chancellor , this all feels like a long time ago. Developers now face very different challenges to the ones posed in the period covered by these accounts 鈥 the most recent of which run to July this year. Since 23 September, by between 40% and 50% as the cost of mortgages has soared, and big questions are being asked about what 2023 will hold for the sector.

Here, Housing Today looks back at the industry鈥檚 stellar performance, and asks what the data says about which firms are best placed to face the coming storm.

Rebound effect

According to Housing Today鈥檚 analysis, the UK鈥檚 50 biggest firms pulled in 拢38.6bn in revenue in their most recent accounts, up from 拢31.8bn last year, generating a healthy 拢5.6bn of operating profit at an 11.7% margin 鈥 up from 7.8% last year (note: these totalled figures are not directly comparable to the numbers we published last year here, as then we only ranked the top 35 housebuilders). Barratt remained the UK鈥檚 biggest builder by turnover, Persimmon the one generating the most operating profit.

barratt

Barratt was the UK鈥檚 biggest housebuilder by turnover

The year-end dates of the housebuilders within the tables varied, but a large number covered the 2021 calendar year, meaning that there is a large element of covid recovery within these numbers, from firms where the previous figures had been marred by two months of enforced lockdown.

Clyde Lewis, deputy head of research at analyst house Peel Hunt, says: 鈥淥f course 2020 was covid hit, so you鈥檝e obviously got a very easy comparator. That on its own explains a great deal of the growth.鈥

Bob Weston, chairman of privately held Essex-based housebuilder Weston Homes, which slipped from 26th to 27th in the table despite posting 20% turnover growth to 拢214m, says the year has been about building back to 鈥減re-pandemic levels of profitability鈥 鈥 for which Weston was about 60% of the way there.

But, of course, last year鈥檚 growth not only reflects a rebound effect from the 2020 lockdown 鈥 a number of the firms had already incorporated that rebound in last year鈥檚 figures. It also reflects the unprecedented two-year housing market romp sparked by the lockdown reassessment of people鈥檚 housing needs and exacerbated by then-chancellor Rishi Sunak鈥檚 stamp duty cut.

James Thomson, chief executive of Gleeson, which hopped just one place up the tables to 17th despite a 29% leap in turnover to 拢373m, says the biggest reason for the performance in the year was 鈥渧ery strong structural demand from first-time buyers for affordable new-build homes in the geographies in which we operate鈥.

He added: 鈥淲e were selling as much as we could build 鈥 the thing holding us back was the ability to get sites.鈥

Challenges

There were significant challenges during this period 鈥 not in selling homes but in delivering them. Nowhere was this challenge more acute than in securing materials. Shane Carberry, building analyst at Irish analyst Goodbody, says: 鈥淚nitially the challenge post-pandemic was getting your hands on products, given supply chain shortages. Then, from late 2021, it was the level of inflation 鈥 which became fairly exceptional.

鈥淭he PLCs have had the buying power in this inflationary environment, and it has been harder for the smaller builders.鈥

鈥淲e were selling as much as we could build 鈥 the thing holding us back was the ability to get sites鈥

James Thomson, Gleeson

Gleeson鈥檚 Thomson says he even resorted to shipping materials between live sites in order to keep construction going when suppliers let the housebuilder down. 鈥淲e took some pretty unusual actions that we wouldn鈥檛 normally do, but fortunately we were able to keep sites going,鈥 he says. Given significant house price rises and the huge demand for homes, housebuilders were able to increase operating profit, which rose 33% for the top 50 despite the materials shortages.

James Thomson CEO Gleeson cropped

Chief executive James Thomson says the ability to get hold of sites held Gleeson back

But margins did not return to their pre-pandemic level 鈥 Housing Today reported margins of 12.3% in the top 35 prior to the pandemic as opposed to 11.4% for the top 35 in this year鈥檚 selection 鈥 which can be blamed on the competition for materials, workers and, increasingly, land.

Thomson is one of many to also cite planning as a significant inhibitor on sector growth during this period of bounce-back, in not delivering enough sites to the housebuilding industry. He estimates the time taken to achieve planning approval has doubled since the pandemic, from around seven or eight months prior to 2020.

Thomson is not alone. A Persimmon spokesperson says these planning delays contributed to its lower growth in the 2021 calendar year, which saw it slip back from second to third place in the table. 鈥淚n simple terms we didn鈥檛 have the outlets to enable us to build fast enough,鈥 the spokesperson says. 

Recession

From the current outlook, it is tempting to view these as nice problems to have. Right now, the industry is facing predictions of the longest recession on record, with the Office for Budget Responsibility estimating completions will drop by 25% from current levels by 2025/26 as house prices fall 9.2% peak-to-trough.

Sales rates have slumped, commonly to under 0.5 sales per site per week, according to those housebuilders that have reported trading updates. To cap it all, the government has just for first-time buyers at the exact moment that a shift in the mortgage market has put homes out of reach of many. Listed housebuilders as a sector have lost nearly half of their value during 2022.

However, there remains optimism among residential developers that the situation will not end up as bad as many fear. The case for positivity rests on the idea that mortgage rates have already peaked, alongside the continuing strength of both the employment market and rental prices.

>> See also: Help to Buy: It鈥檚 the end of an era

>> See also: What are housebuilding鈥檚 prospects in the wake of the mini-Budget?

Tony Williams, analyst at 好色先生TV Value, says: 鈥淭he key thing is employment is holding up 鈥 that鈥檚 the best indicator of demand, and rents keep going up. So, the likes of Gleeson are still able to say it鈥檚 cheaper to buy than to rent.鈥

Peel Hunt鈥檚 Lewis adds that the strength of rental prices means 鈥渢he truth is people are going to have to reassess what they spend on their housing costs鈥.

Weston Homes鈥 Bob Weston says: 鈥淚 think the market will stay dry until January or February, as sentiment around interest rates becomes a little bit more normal, rather than the shock. Output will go down.

鈥淏ut logic tells us that by about February, as we launch to go into the spring/summer, undersupply in the market will stoke demand. It will be to a level that we need 鈥 it鈥檚 not that we鈥檙e booming 鈥 enough to hold the business.鈥

Write-downs

Likewise, Earl Sibley, newly promoted chief operating officer at Vistry, says he is 鈥渃autiously optimistic鈥 for trading next year, given the 鈥渟tability鈥 coming back in the financial market in recent weeks, which has seen for the first time since the immediate aftermath of the mini-Budget. He says Vistry is not dropping its house prices.

鈥淓mployment is still good, some people are getting good pay rises, while [the] renting [market] is bonkers in many parts of the country, and the undersupply of housing gets worse by the year,鈥 he adds.

鈥淭he truth is people are going to have to reassess what they spend on their housing costs鈥

Clyde Lewis, Peel Hunt

Most housebuilders are protected by the fact they are in good financial shape, having learnt the lessons of the 2008 financial crisis, when the biggest players were brought to their knees due to their significant debts. Nevertheless, major house price falls could still see some forced to make write-downs, says Clyde Lewis, with Crest Nicholson  seen as the most vulnerable to this among the listed builders.

鈥淲e aren鈥檛 going to see desperation rights issues to raise money, and these firms don鈥檛 need to run their businesses for cash,鈥 he says. 鈥淏ut write-downs are possible. If prices fall around 5% it will be pretty limited, but if they go down 10% it will be much more widespread.鈥

Analysts say that those best placed to weather the coming storm will be those with the soundest finances, positive forward order books, a strong sales and marketing function, and customers less reliant on mortgages to purchase.

So, while Bob Weston, for example, can boast being already 86% forward-sold to July next year, Persimmon is in the more uncertain position of having reported a sharp decline in its forward sales at its most recent update 鈥 to 拢770m from 拢1.15bn at the same point last year 鈥 less than a fifth of its annual turnover.

鈥淟ogic tells us that by about February as we go into the spring, undersupply in the market will stoke demand鈥 

Bob Weston, Weston Homes

Goodbody鈥檚 Carberry says that both Persimmon鈥檚 and Gleeson鈥檚 relatively higher exposure to the mortgage market 鈥 their customers are more likely to be first-time buyers with bigger loans 鈥 make them more susceptible than the likes of Redrow, which has a much higher selling price and low exposure to Help to Buy. However, Gleeson鈥檚 Thomson disagrees.

鈥淲hen mortgage rates increase, our lower price-point gives us a competitive advantage. There will be customers who can鈥檛 afford to buy elsewhere who look to us now that wouldn鈥檛 have done before,鈥 he says.

CGI of the proposals for Littleborough that Vistry Partnerships Yorkshire has been appointed to deliver

Source: Vistry Partnerships

Vistry鈥檚 Littleborough scheme. The housebuilder is expected to outperform the market next year

The big change the market will expose, says Bob Weston, is those housebuilders not getting the fundamentals of sales and marketing right. 鈥淚t goes back to doing the old-fashioned things we used to do well. We鈥檝e had staff in sales offices for the last 10 years have been order-takers,鈥 he says.

鈥淔or us, you鈥檝e got three key elements [to get right]: you鈥檝e got the product, the price and the presentation. And the price is the last one. [鈥 I don鈥檛 see prices falling back.鈥

Vistry, which has just merged with Countryside and will next year probably be one of the top three housebuilders by volume, is now alone in combining partnerships housing with private housebuilding 鈥 a combination that Earl Sibley says will allow it to demonstrate counter-cyclical performance.

>> Click here to see the full Top 50 tables

鈥淚n our partnerships business we鈥檝e got numerous relationships in those parts exactly where demand is still strong 鈥 for affordable rent, shared ownership, elderly housing. It鈥檚 going to be resilient, and it鈥檚 going to be counter-cyclical.鈥

Shane Carberry agrees the business 鈥渟hould outperform the market鈥 because of the potential for it to operate counter-cyclically. To see whether it does 鈥 and who manages the coming storm most successfully 鈥 we will have to wait until next year.

Who鈥檚 up, who鈥檚 down 鈥 and why

Barratt again topped the table, which is ranked according to turnover on the most recent published accounts, with revenue of 拢5.3bn, up 9.5% for the year to June.

jennie daly 2

Jennie Daly says Taylor Wimpey has delivered 鈥渆xcellent performance鈥

The most notable change was the improvement by Taylor Wimpey in the 2021 calendar year, which increased turnover by 54% to 拢4.3bn, leaping from fourth to second spot. Much of that increase was repairing the harm from the previous year when the firm fell back from its traditional second place to number four after revenue dropped particularly sharply in the pandemic.

Jennie Daly, Taylor Wimpey chief executive, notes an 鈥渆xcellent operational, financial and customer service performance鈥 that had been 鈥渦nderpinned by supportive market conditions鈥. She says: 鈥淲e started the year with a clear strategy in place to optimise sales rates, prices and operational excellence and efficiencies, which enabled us to drive a significant improvement in operating margin.鈥

Persimmon dropped back to third place, posting turnover growth of just 8.5% despite sharing a year-end date with Taylor Wimpey, which a spokesperson says reflected the fact its delivery rates had fallen far less than its rival previously. However, the spokesperson also says housing delivery was constrained by Persimmon鈥檚 decision to rein in land buying prior to the pandemic and to focus on build quality. 

Clyde Lewis, deputy head of research at Peel Hunt, says: 鈥淧ersimmon dropped off land-buying and was slowest to come back to the market in 2020, and has had huge management change.鈥

Big winners within the top 10 were partnerships housebuilders Countryside and Vistry, which moved from ninth to eighth and from seventh to fifth place respectively. Countryside 鈥 whose figures to September 2021 cover the period prior to financial difficulties unearthed in January this year 鈥 saw turnover leap by 54% to 拢1.4bn, while Vistry, in the 2021 calendar year, boosted revenue by 30% to 拢2.4bn.

Operating profit at both soared 鈥 more than doubling at Vistry and more than trebling at Countryside. Earl Sibley, chief operating officer at Vistry, says: 鈥淚t鈥檚 because of the partnerships business that we were fastest out of the blocks in 2020, and it remains an area of huge growth.鈥

He adds that the business was able to increase profitability due to economies of scale delivered from the 2020 merger between Bovis and Linden that created Vistry. Countryside and Vistry merged in November.