好色先生TV

Imagine it鈥檚 12 August 2012. We鈥檙e in London鈥檚 Olympic stadium and we鈥檝e just watched the closing ceremony. The final puff of smoke from the inevitable firework display has just disappeared into the night sky... What happens next?

Right now in 2006 you might be all set to take on the slew of work emanating from the Olympics and from clients wanting to get other big projects finished in time for the event. Or perhaps instead you plan to take on work left behind by the big fish while they鈥檙e distracted by 2012 projects? Either way, construction consultants are in for a busy six years.

But what about the morning after the party? Construction has been growing steadily for 11 years, bar a temporary dip in 2005, so if you add in another six it would mean an unprecedented 17 years of rosy conditions for the industry. How likely is this to continue?

It鈥檚 worth thinking now about how to tackle the possibility of a post-2012 鈥渉angover鈥�. That process must start with an assessment of how the market could look.

Experts agree there will be a downturn in construction after 2012 but there is a debate over how severe it will be.

Only one of those we ask is prepared to put a figure on the downturn. Peter Fordham, associate in Davis Langdon鈥檚 cost research department, reckons there will be a fall in output of roughly 2% for one year after the Olympics. But he adds the caveat that there are many unknowns between now and 2012 that could affect this figure. These are chiefly the global economy, which will drive private sector investment, and government policy, which will drive public sector investment. At this stage we do not even know which party will be in government, Fordham points out.

Joe Martin, director at the BCIS, believes there will be a 鈥渟ignificant slump in demand鈥� after the Olympics. He says while the programme to build the facilities to host the event does not in itself constitute a huge project, there will be a rush of projects throughout the UK all aiming to finish before the Games. Martin points to the extension to the Tate Modern. The 拢215m project is not directly linked to the Olympics but its finishing date is 2012. Martin says: 鈥淚f you are going to put a new ride in a theme park, you're going to do it before the influx of visitors in 2012.鈥�

As a result, in the run up to the Games we will see a drain on resources and competitive market conditions and then half way through 2012, a sudden slump in workload. He says there will be a particular impact on infrastructure and house-building resources before the Games, due to work needed on the Olympic park, transport systems feeding the park and the Olympic village.

Graham Matthews, partner at EC Harris, argues that although there will be a downturn it will be short-lived. He reckons it will last between six and nine months.

He predicts the UK economy as a whole will see a dip in activity during this period. This will result in, for example, fewer hotel room bookings and a fall in volume of food going through restaurants.

But Matthews says: 鈥淲hile the Olympics is big, it鈥檚 not that big: as a percentage of construction volume in the Southeast it is small, plus it鈥檚 spread over five years and country-wide.鈥�

He adds that construction of Heathrow鈥檚 terminal 5 is a project of a similar size and it is not 鈥渉aving a major meltdown effect on the market either鈥�.

Graham Kean, partner and head of public sector at EC Harris, adds that similar fears of a downturn in the UK after the Millennium, which also sparked a flurry of activity, were unfounded. 鈥淭here was a hiatus after the Millennium but it was short-lived,鈥� he says, although he concedes a handful of Millennium projects went on long after 2000 passed. The Spinnaker Tower in Portsmouth, for example, was only completed this year. The deadlines for Olympic projects are clearly not negotiable.

Matthews argues that over the long term the post-Olympic effect will be a boost to construction because hosting the Olympics tends to raise a country鈥檚 profile and attract investors.

Martin at the BCIS adds that some big projects are likely go on after the Olympics, such as the redevelopment of Kings Cross and Stratford City. 鈥淭he people working on Stratford may well say they don鈥檛 want the area to be a building site during the Games, so lets not build until after 2012. And look at Crossrail 鈥� is it sensible to be digging a load of holes in London when all these visitors are in town or would it be better to wait?鈥�

The Olympics itself will also provide a significant chunk of post-Games work. The many temporary sports venues will need dismantling and the Olympic Village must be converted into a residential development. The athletes鈥� dwellings will need to have kitchens added, for example.

But this alone won鈥檛 be enough to keep the entire construction economy afloat, admits Matthews at EC Harris. He says in order to minimise the post-Games downturn the construction industry should already be thinking about which projects must be kicked off in the period immediately after the Olympics. 鈥淲e should think about procuring them in 2010 and starting onsite in 2012鈥�, he says. Davis Langdon鈥檚 Fordham adds that firms could try to pick up more work abroad. Rather like lining your stomach before the party, forward planning now will minimise pain later.