All articles by Stacy Sinclair
-
CommentSection 105: Savoye and Savoye Limited vs Spicers Limited
This judgment provides guidance on the definition of 鈥榗onstruction operations鈥� and the meaning of 鈥榝orming, or to form, part of the land鈥�
-
CommentMiller Construction (UK) Limited vs 好色先生TV Design Partnership Limited: Breach of natural justice
鈥楾his Scottish judgment is a reminder of the well-established authorities that provide an adjudicator with considerable leeway in terms of their decision-making powers鈥�
-
CommentLimitation of adjudication: Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd vs Higgins Construction Plc
Did the adjudication process give Aspect a new cause of action against Higgins to recover the money which it had paid out on the temporarily binding decision of the adjudicator?
-
CommentDefective Premises Act 1972: 'In the course of a business'
Niklas Zennstrom and Catherine Zennstrom vs Kevin Fagot, Helen Moseley, Deborah Patricia Wilks, Andrew Ramus and Fast-Calc Limited
-
CommentPublic procurement: Turning Point vs Norfolk council
In this case the TCC considered issues of limitation as well as qualifications/caveats to tenders in public procurement
-
Archive TitlesSettlement agreements and exclusion of liability for defects: Point West London Ltd v Mivan Ltd
Technology & Construction Court considers the meaning of the phrase 鈥榝ull and final settlement in respect of any and all outstanding matters鈥� in a settlement agreement
-
CommentPart 36 offers: Phi Group Ltd v Robert West Consulting
In this case the Court of Appeal considered the requirements of Part 36 offers and overturned a costs decision in the Technology & Construction Court
-
CommentRegularly and diligently: Leander Construction Ltd vs Mulalley & Co Ltd
This case sets out the law regarding implied terms requiring a party to proceed regularly and diligently
-
CommentMultiple disputes in adjudiation: Witney council vs Beam Construction Ltd
Can more than one dispute be referred to an adjudicator?
-
CommentApparent bias in adjudication: Lanes Group vs Galliford Try Infrastructure
Can a preliminary views document lead to bias in an adjudication?
-
CommentNegligence and the Limitation Act
The limitation period for a negligence claim can be extended for latent defects but this case shows why its best to issue proceedings promptly
-
CommentDefective Premises Act: Mr and Mrs Jenson vs Spencer Roy Faux
This case explains why 鈥檅uyer beware鈥� should be the first rule of thumb when buying a house
-
CommentThe value of architectural services: Michael Phillips Architects vs Mr and Mrs Riklin
This case demonstrates just what might go wrong if a consultant鈥檚 appointment is not established at the outset of the project 鈥� and how things can spin rapidly out of control
-
Comment
Public Procurement: Mears vs Leeds city council
This case illustrates the full meaning of the term, 鈥渢he date when grounds for the bringing of the proceedings first arose鈥�, and serves as a warning to parties within a public tendering process who wish to bring infringmement proceedings.
-
CommentPublic Procurement: Exel Europe vs University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Here we look in detail at Regulation 47 of the Public Contracts Regulation, concerning the award of a public contract; a reworking of American Cyanamid Co vs Ethican
-
好色先生TVThe Party Wall Act: Kaye vs Lawrence
After this case an adjoining owner can request project insurance even if the work is being carried out on the building owner鈥檚 land
-
FeaturesChalbury McCouat vs PG Foils: failure to choose location for arbitration
These parties agreed the dispute resolution mechanism but failed to say in which country the arbitral tribunal should be held
-
CommentAedifice vs Mr Ashwin Shah: Does the adjudicator have jurisdiction?
The process of objecting to an adjudicator鈥檚 jurisdiction has to be conducting properly, as this case highlights鈥�
-
好色先生TVSpeymill Contracts vs Eric Baskind: The allegation of fraud in adjudication
Following recent cases in the Technology & Construction Court, the Court of Appeal has now confirmed how parties should proceed when allegations of fraud are raised during the adjudication or enforcement process
-
好色先生TV
Crowley Civil Engineers vs Rushmoor council: Claiming a contribution
Out Fenwick Elliott expert describes a dispute over an open space in Hampshire