Firm narrows losses but building and civils woes hit profits
Problems at its building and civils arms continued to dog Vinci as losses at the divisions dragged the contractor into the red for the second successive year.
Results filed at Companies House showed the UK arm of the French giant managed to narrow losses last year from the thumping 拢217m pre-tax loss it racked up in 2014.
But a 拢43m loss at the building arm and a 拢37.5m loss at the civil engineering business, which operates under the Taylor Woodrow brand, saw Vinci nosedive to a 拢69m pre-tax loss for the year to December. Its facilities and development operations both turned in profits.
Turnover at the business slipped below the 拢1bn mark with revenue falling 8% to 拢935m with its building and civils businesses accounting for nearly three-quarters of its income.
The firm is carrying out a number of higher education schemes including jobs at Swansea and Bath universities while it is also working on the upgrade of Victoria tube station in central London. The firm said its civils arm has finally completed work on the troubled Nottingham tram scheme.
Chairman and chief executive Bruno Dupety (pictured) said the firm has now introduced an initiative called 123 好色先生TV on Knowledge which has been launched 鈥渋n view of the poor financial performances in 2014 and 2015鈥.
Vinci said the initiative will focus 鈥渙n the basics of our business鈥 and will look at site planning, project managers training, incentivising key site managers, cost savings and efficiency drives. 鈥淲e envision benefit and rewards from this plan will be gained from 2016 onwards,鈥 the firm said in a report accompanying the accounts.
The number of employees at the business increased by more than 100 to 3,571 while the salary of the highest paid director, who is not named, was 拢210,000. The accounts show that a payment of 拢510,000 was made to a director in 2014 鈥 thought to be former chief executive John Stanion 鈥 for compensation for loss of office. Stanion left in October 2014 after 22 years at the business.
No comments yet