好色先生TV

Union Unite, the 鈥榣ast man standing鈥� of four blacklisting victims groups pursuing contractors for compensation in the High Court, has succeeded in an emergency request to put back the start of the full hearing.

The hearing had been due to begin on Monday (9 May), but has now been put back until Tuesday 7 June, according to Unite.

The union, acting on behalf of around 90 workers, made the emergency submission due to its increased workload following the decision to settle by the other three blacklisting victims groups represented by Ucatt, GMB and the Blacklist Support Group.

Unite director of legal services, Howard Beckett said: 鈥淯nite applied for an adjournment at the High Court today (Wednesday 4 May) and this was granted by Lord Justice Supperstone until Tuesday 7 June.

鈥淭he reason for the application was that the four claimant teams have now become one which meant that it was impractical for the trial, estimated to take 11 weeks, to start on Monday 9 May鈥�.

鈥淚n addition, some late disclosure has come in from the Information Commissioner鈥檚 Office and this evidence needs to be considered and evaluated by our legal team鈥�, he added.

Unite added that it issued a witness summons last week for Sir Robert McAlpine company director Cullum McAlpine to appear in court to give evidence. The union expects him to appear in June.

The eight contractors collectively known as the Macfarlanes Defendants - Balfour Beatty, Carillion, Costain, Kier, Laing O鈥橰ourke, Sir Robert McAlpine, Skanska UK and Vinci - have been contacted for comment on the delay and Cullum McAlpine鈥檚 witness summons.

Of the 782 claimants against the Macfarlanes Defendents hundreds have settled out of court or withdrawn their claims. Settlements are thought to have reached six figures in some cases, with the total compensation bill for contractors set to run to tens of millions of pounds.

A source close to the process said claimants were under pressure to accept settlements - known as Part 36 offers - as if these were declined and then subsequently they were awarded a lower compensation sum through the court process they could then be liable for legal costs, which the source said would 鈥渂ankrupt鈥� the claimants. But the source added: 鈥淲e still see it as a very big victory鈥�.

In a statement last Friday the Macfarlanes Defendents said they had settled with victims represented by unions Ucatt and GMB and the Blacklist Support Group.

The Macfarlanes Defendants added: 鈥淭hese construction companies now wish to draw a line under this matter and continue to work together with the trade unions at national, regional and site level to ensure that the modern UK construction industry provides.鈥�

The Blacklist Support Group said: 鈥淚t was the hard work and tenacity of rank & file activists that has brought [blacklisting] into the political discourse. What has already been achieved is a massive victory for the trade union movement but the fight is not over yet.鈥�

GMB and Ucatt confirmed they had settled but declined to comment further.

Beckett said: 鈥淯nite has not reached any settlement although we continue to negotiate to achieve justice.

鈥淭he key question that has to be asked of the construction firms, which made an unprecedented admission of guilt last October, is why have they not yet settled?

鈥淯nite continues to seek maximum compensation and justice on behalf of our members following those admissions.鈥�