好色先生TV

The Housing Corporation is planning to force the sale of Ujima to rival London & Quadrant. This is the first time the regulator has had to do this.

Without intervention Ujima, which houses 4,600 Londoners, mostly from ethnic minorities, could go bankrupt within weeks. This would make it the first housing association to go bust since the Housing Corporation was formed in 1964.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML), which represents the banks that lend to housing associations, said the collapse of such a high-profile association, coupled with the current turmoil in financial markets would have an 鈥渦pward impact on pricing鈥� for loans to associations.

At the moment, housing associations can borrow at interest rates up to 2% less than those offered to comparable organisations because, until now, the Housing Corporation鈥檚 regulations were seen as a guarantee that no association could go bust.

Andrew Heywood, deputy director of policy at the CML, said: 鈥淭his will serve as a forceful reminder that lending to associations is not risk-free.鈥�

A senior housing association source said the collapse was likely to make it harder for some associations to lend money at beneficial interest rates: 鈥淏anks are going to be more choosey about who they lend to.鈥�

This is a reminder that lending to associations is not risk-free

Andrew Heywood, CML

Housing associations鈥� preferential treatments is worth 拢300m, the CML says. This money funds many of the 35,000 homes they built each year.

Ujima was a leading developer until the Housing Association suspended public grants to it in June after it failed a routine inspection. However the regulator did not intervene until the end of October last year. After this it found it was on course to lose 拢7m over the year, which breached the terms of 拢164m worth of loans it it had taken out, and triggered repayment.

Ujima said in a statement it was also facing a charge of 拢7-14m because of 鈥渋njudicious development schemes鈥�.

Derek Joseph, director of consultant Tribal Treasury Services, questioned why the Housing Corporation has not intervened earlier.

The Housing Corporation declined to comment on concerns it had not acted quickly enough. A statement on its website said: 鈥淭he Housing Corporation considered all other options and concluded that a transfer to London & Quadrant was the best possible one.鈥�