Housing Corporation chairman Peter Dixon expects to squeeze profits up to 10%
Developers that bid for this summer鈥檚 拢3.3bn competition to build social housing will have to accept tighter margins if they want to be successful.
The warning from the Housing Corporation, which hopes to attract private firms to bid for its 拢3.3bn two-year spending programme, was made to ensure it makes the efficiency savings demanded by the government.
Speaking to 好色先生TV at last week鈥檚 annual Chartered Institute of Housing conference in Harrogate, corporation chairman Peter Dixon, pictured, said that developers made 鈥25-30% profit and could afford to have that squeezed鈥.
The ODPM says the corporation must make 拢430m in efficiency savings by April 2008, the end of the government鈥檚 spending round. This money will be reinvested in building more housing.
In a separate speech at the Harrogate conference, Jon Rouse, the corporation鈥檚 chief executive, said to hit this target would require 拢9000 to be cut from the average grant per unit of social housing. This saving would reduce the average grant per unit to 拢70,000 for 2007/8.
Dixon said: 鈥淪ome of the 拢9000 that Jon talked about will have to come off land prices and developers鈥 profits. We are not going to get this from squeezing materials alone. The profitability of developers at the moment is probably higher than it needs to be. They would argue that they take risks but they can afford to make less. We will put in less grant per unit to achieve this 鈥 you鈥檝e got to squeeze the whole lot.鈥
He said if the corporation was not 鈥渁ble to do deals with developers鈥 then he doubted that the efficiency goal and the housebuilding target (of 67,000 in the two years) to April 2008 would be met.
He said: 鈥淚 know they won鈥檛 want to take a profit hit but if the private market is slowing down then I think we are in a position to squeeze profit 2-10%. It will depend on the particular scheme.鈥
There was a cool reaction to Dixon鈥檚 proposal. One housebuilder said: 鈥淣aturally the corporation wants value for money, but if it wants to squeeze our profits then the private sector will just go off and invest somewhere else.鈥
No comments yet