High Court case brought by local resident begins today, with decision expected early next year

Shell Centre London south bank

A legal challenge into communities secretary Eric Pickles鈥 decision to approve Squire & Partners鈥 Shell Centre scheme over the summer begins later today.

The High Court case has been brought by local resident and writer George Turner who claims Pickles鈥 decision was flawed and will unleash a planning free-for-all on the South Bank.

He has brought the action against the secretary of state, as well as the mayor of London, Lambeth council, Shell and developer Braeburn Estates, a joint venture between Qatari Diar and Canary Wharf Group.

His challenge relates to affordable housing, the setting of heritage assets and open space.

In his particulars of claim, Turner says that 鈥渢he nub of the issue is that by concluding that there was no harm caused to any heritage assets by this development [Pickles] was unable to perform his duties under the Planning Listed 好色先生TV and Conservation Area Act which requires him to give 鈥榮pecial regard to the desirability of preserving鈥 listed buildings and conservation areas鈥.

 

Developer's CGI of the Shell Centre development as it would look from Waterloo Bridge

Developer鈥檚 CGI of the Shell Centre development as it would look from Waterloo Bridge. George Turner argues this is evidence that Eric Pickles鈥 conclusion that 鈥榥o harm鈥 would be done to the setting of heritage assets is 鈥榰nreasonable鈥

 

Turner, who has been given protection against costs, says that heritage assets affected include the Westminster World Heritage Site, the grade I listed Royal Festival Hall and the existing Shell Centre, calling Pickles鈥 decision that 鈥渘o harm鈥 would be done to views and settings 鈥減erverse鈥.

He adds that the planning inspector鈥檚 statement that the development would not be 鈥渧isually intrusive鈥 in views designated by the London Views Management Framework was 鈥渋rrational鈥 and says: 鈥淎ny reasonable person鈥ould not reasonably come to the conclusion that the development was not 鈥榲isually intrusive鈥.鈥

The development will feature eight buildings ranging from five to 37 storeys with the scheme comprising offices, retail, leisure and close to 900 homes.

But the defendants have pledged to fight the case, which is expected to last today and tomorrow, and say Turner鈥檚 application should be dismissed.

A statement issued by Braeburn Estates over the summer said it was 鈥渄isappointed by this individual鈥檚 application鈥 since the planning application had been through such an extensive consultation and planning process culminating in approval.

鈥淭his support followed our demonstration of the many regeneration benefits it would deliver to the local area, London and the UK as a whole,鈥 said the statement.

鈥淲e will work closely with all parties involved in this legal challenge, and hope it will prove to be both conclusive and positive for the redevelopment of the Shell Centre.鈥 A decision by Mr Justice Collins is expected in the New Year.

Other architects working on the development include KPF, Grid, Patel Taylor and Stanton Williams.