好色先生TV

A building safety expert has warned that the government鈥檚 proposal to create a new regulator for high-risk residential buildings to improve safety after the Grenfell fire could end up creating a two-tier building control system where lower-risk buildings receive less scrutiny.

Martin Taylor, director of regulatory policy at Local Authority 好色先生TV Control, told a 好色先生TV Live Club conference last week that focusing on high-risk residential buildings (HRRB) must not work to the detriment of others. 

Earlier this month, the government launched a consultation on the practical steps to implement Dame Judith Hackitt鈥檚 review of building safety regulations, including a new plan for a national 好色先生TV Safety Regulator for HRRBs, defined as residential blocks that are higher than 18m. The consultation left open the possibility that the regulator could oversee all buildings over 18m where people sleep, such as care homes and prisons, but it is expected that all other building types would remain under the remit of building control.

Taylor said: 鈥淥ur biggest concern if a separate regulator was set up is we would lose some of the expertise in our network. You can imagine a top tier of very competent, very qualified building control surveyors would be taken from the delivery of local authority building control into the delivery of a separate regulator.鈥�

Read: The Hackitt consultation: Calling for culture change

Taylor said while this would be good for the new regulator, it would potentially compromise all the other public protection services that local building control does, such as safety at sports grounds, demolition and the control of buildings that would be out of scope of the regulator.

He said: 鈥淚 would guard against, if it is a completely separate thing, that the expertise is pulled from one area into the other 鈥� we don鈥檛 want to create a two-tier building control system.鈥�

Speaking at the same event, Nick Coombe, strategic technical adviser for the London Fire Brigade, said the government鈥檚 proposals to make project teams submit fully worked up designs, including the product specification, could cause high-risk projects to grind to a halt.

Teams would have to submit the detail and get this signed off by the regulator at the so-called gateway two stage inspection before building work starts. Any deviations from the approved design, including product substitution, would mean project teams could face stiff penalties.

He said: 鈥淭hey won鈥檛 be able to do that [substitute products] unless it鈥檚 signed off by the regulator. Unless they鈥檝e costed it correctly, we might end up with a load of projects around the country that never get finished as they鈥檝e run out of money. We can鈥檛 have a load of unfinished buildings as we need housing in this country.鈥�