好色先生TV

The publication of the white paper, which outlines the government鈥檚 response to the Barker review of land use planning, had been pencilled in for next week. However, Yvette Cooper, the planning minister, has now told officials that the document will not be published until after the council elections on 3 May.

The deadline later this month has partly been prompted by Tony Blair鈥檚 eagerness to see the paper published before he steps down. It would also be against parlimentary protocol to announce it in the weeks before the elections.

Ministers are understood to have pushed back publication because of concerns that it would stoke the anti-Labour backlash anticipated at the elections, when the government is expected to suffer heavy losses.

The depth of public opposition to relaxing curbs on building was underlined by a survey published last week by the Saint Consulting Group. This showed that 83% of the population does not want new development.

Another government worry is the threat of court action by Friends of the Earth, which says it will challenge any step to abolish ministerial scrutiny of large infrastructure projects, a key element of the paper.

好色先生TV has learned the white paper contains measures to:

• Replace the 13-week target for processing the largest developments with 鈥減lanning delivery agreements鈥� between applicants and local councils
• Speed up the handling of large infrastructure projects such as nuclear power stations and airports, by creating a national framework to determine where they should be located
• Establish an independent commission, to decide on large infrastructure projects
• Streamline the production of councils鈥� local development frameworks by abolishing the need to consult the public on the initial stage of the process.

The drafting of the white paper is being handled by Geoffrey Norris, one of Blair鈥檚 Cabinet Office special advisers. He is expected to leave the government after Blair goes.

A House Builders Association source said: 鈥淎ll the positive stuff, like the white paper, is being watered down and pushed back and the unhelpful stuff, like the home information packs, is rolling forward.鈥�

However, Ankers said the chancellor鈥檚 longstanding concerns about planning problems gave him confidence that the reform process would stay on course, despite the delay. 鈥淭he Treasury is really frustrated with the planning system,鈥� he said.

Rhynd Smith, the policy director of the Royal Town Planning Institute, said the delay was sensible given that consultation had only just closed on Barker鈥檚 report.

He said: 鈥淚t would be an incredibly tall order to get anything out before the end of the month. If the planning white paper is going to deliver an implementable review of the existing system, then there is no doubt that it requires thought.鈥�