鈥 as Balfour Beatty puts a 拢200m pricetag is put on the aquatics centre

The most eagerly awaited design for a construction project in recent British history was unveiled on Wednesday by the Olympic Delivery Authority.

By chance, the announcement coincided with another keenly anticipated Olympic event: the submission of Balfour Beatty鈥檚 tender for the aquatic centre. That bid weighed in at 拢200m.

During the Games the 拢496m stadium will have an upper tier of seats and a cable-stayed roof covering two-thirds of the 80,000-strong audience. It will be surrounded by a fabric 鈥渨rap鈥 illustrated with designs and topped off with a steel crown.

After the Games the stadium鈥檚 upper tier and roof will be dismantled, with the lower tier remaining as a 25,000-seat stadium for legacy use. Steel and materials used for the temporary structure will be recycled.

The design-and-build team for the stadium is made up of Sir Robert McAlpine, architect HOK Sport and structural engineer Buro Happold.

But Alison Nimmo, the ODA design director, said an iconic design such as Norman Foster's arch at Wembley Stadium would not have fitted with the ethos of the stadium. She said: 鈥淒o you invest in so-called big names in architecture, or do you ensure legacy by taking a more fundamental approach?鈥

Meanwhile, Balfour Beatty, now the sole bidder for the aquatics centre, has given its tender to the ODA. Sources close to the aquatics centre bid said that, together with construction of a neighbouring bridge and plaza, the building of the centre will cost about 拢200m.

This is far higher than the bid book estimate of 拢100m, but that does not take in the construction of the surrounding infrastructure. A timber roof is being considered for the structure although it is understood that it resilience is the subject of 鈥漵ecurity concerns鈥.

It is understood that the centre, like the stadium, will become a design-and-build project after the guaranteed maximum price is agreed. Construction is expected to start in July.

The latest project cost estimate for the stadium is 拢496m, but neither Rod Sheard, HOK Sport鈥檚 senior principal architect, nor John Armitt, the ODA chairman, was able to name a build cost at the design launch.

So is it great 鈥 or absolutely tawdry?

Will Alsop, SMC Alsop
I think it鈥檚 horribly disappointing. Why is it that whenever there鈥檚 a fucking sports stadium in the world HOK do it? London is strong enough to do something else. It鈥檚 crap. It鈥檒l be quite nice, but not what it should be.

Tarek Merlin, 好色先生TV columnist
It鈥檚 obviously a great shame we鈥檝e lost the magic of the Foreign Office design and ended up with this. It鈥檚 very standard; there鈥檚 no architecture in it. That鈥檚 the problem with these bids.

Sunand Prasad, RIBA president
It is an intelligent response that meets both the large-scale needs of the games and the legacy needs of having a stadium of the right size and atmosphere. Celebrate 鈥 it鈥檚 an excellent design and still evolving.

Ken Shuttleworth, Make
I think it looks pretty exciting. People might say it looks standard, but there鈥檚 nothing standard about having a detachable 55,000-seat section. It鈥檚 never been done before. It鈥檚 really sensible. I love it.

Downloads