好色先生TV

MPs have rejected a proposal that would protect leaseholders and tenants in England from having to pay for fire safety remediation work.

The move was in response to peers鈥� attempts to make the government pay for the works and recover the money from developers later.

Ministers said the proposal, which was a House of Lords amendment to the Fire Safety Bill, would lead to delays in making buildings safe.

Last night, MPs voted by a majority of 69 to remove the amendment that would have made developers, contractors and product manufacturers responsible, with the government paying the costs upfront before reclaiming them.

Housing minister Chris Pincher said government could not support the proposal, because it was 鈥渦nworkable and impractical鈥�.

He said: 鈥淭hey will make legislation less clear; they do not reflect the complexity involved in apportioning liability for remedial defects,鈥� he said.

Speaking ahead of last night鈥檚 vote Tory MP Royston Smith said leaseholders were being forced to stump up thousands of pounds to resolve issues that were not their fault.

He said: 鈥淚n my hand this evening I have an invoice, it鈥檚 an invoice for service charges and remediation of fire safety defects, it is an invoice for nearly 拢79,000.

鈥淚f this Bill becomes law we will be abandoning hundreds of thousands of innocent people and I鈥檓 not going to have that on my conscience.鈥�

The government faced heavy criticism last month when it announced it was putting an additional 拢3.5bn towards removing unsafe cladding from buildings more than 18m high. This was on top of 拢1.6bn for cladding removal announced last year.

Cladding campaigners described the announcement of extra funding and the introduction of a developer tax as a 鈥渂etrayal鈥� of affected homeowners because it would only cover properties over six storeys high, forcing other residents to take out loans.

Housing secretary Robert Jenrick told the House of Commons it would forward fund the cost of cladding repairs for building over 18m in height but that occupants of lower rise buildings will be forced to use loans at 鈥済enerous鈥� rates to cover costs.

Those living in buildings lower than 18m in height 鈥� around six storeys 鈥� will be expected to take out a loan, secured against the property, with the guarantee that payments for individuals will never exceed 拢50 a month.

In addition, Jenrick鈥檚 statement to the Commons implied that only the cost of cladding repairs will be covered by the grants, rather than the multitude of wider fire safety issues exposed since the Grenfell tragedy, which have been estimated to cost up to 拢15bn.