好色先生TV

锘縈oney is being wasted on expensive financing for PPP projects because their investment risk ratings are higher than they should be, according to research.
A report by Robert Bain, a former director at ratings agency Standard & Poors, suggests that 25 PPP projects should have defaulted on their loans, based on the average default rate of firms with a similar risk rating. The actual figure is just eight.

Credit rating agencies assess the level of risk posed by a company and assign it a rating based on how likely a lender is to get its money back. The more risky a firm is deemed to be, the more interest it must pay.

锘縋PP projects are generally classed as high risk, 鈥渘on-investment鈥� grade. Bain said that if the real risk of default were used as a basis for ratings, financing PPP projects could be much cheaper than is currently the case. However, assessing investment risk can be difficult.

Stephen Ratcliffe, director of the UK Contractors Group, said: 鈥淭here has been a big improvement in the structure of PPP deals since they were first introduced, as people have a better understanding of the potential risks. But [PPP] isn鈥檛 very fashionable at the moment and it鈥檚 easy to see where it went wrong, with hindsight.鈥�

A recent report by the Public Accounts Committee, a government spending watchdog, showed how much influence financing has on PPP project pricing. Its inquiry into the M25 widening scheme showed that delays in procurement increased financing costs by 拢660m.

The PPP market in the UK is one of the biggest in the world; projects with a capital value of 拢56.5bn have been signed since the early ninties. Over the lifetime of these deals, further payments will total 拢224bn, according to Treasury figures.

Further investment from the private sector will also be needed in the future, and, with the Green Investment Bank still at least three years away and no alternative yet proposed, PPP is the only solution at present.