好色先生TV

Labour is likely to back controversial government plans to scrap nutrient neutrality rules despite the move provoking uproar from environmental groups, the party has said.

This morning Michael Gove said he plans to strip environment quango Natural England of the duty to block housebuilding in areas where protected habitats are at risk from nitrate and phosphate pollution, a move described by the Wildlife Trusts as 鈥渄isgraceful鈥�.

However, with the move dependent upon securing amendments to the controversial Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill (LURB), Labour shadow housing secretary Lisa Nandy has said the official opposition will 鈥渟upport effective measures that get Britain building鈥�.

Housebuilders blame the nutrient neutrality rules for holding up construction of up to 150,000 homes in the planning pipeline, with effective development moratoriums in place in more than 74 local authorities.

Since a 2018 European Court ruling, local authorities have been unable to approve plans for new homes in areas where Natural England has advised them protected habitats are in poor condition, given they would be open to legal challenge. Natural England now has such advice in place in 74 councils across England.

In response to the announcement, which the government said would see an additional 100,000 homes built, Lisa Nandy criticised the government for both failing to build enough homes and protect the environment. However, Labour sources confirmed that while the Party will wait to see the exact wording of the amendment before finally confirming its position, it was ready to support reforms to the nutrient neutrality rules.

>>See also: 

Nandy said: 鈥淲ith housebuilding projected to fall to the lowest level since World War II and our rivers full of sewage, the Conservatives are failing on both housing and the environment.

鈥淟abour will support effective measures that get Britain building, but it鈥檚 laughable to think that a Prime Minister who is too weak to stand up to the NIMBYs on his backbenches can be trusted to deliver the housing Britain needs.鈥�

Nandy added that Labour supported a 鈥渟trategic鈥� approach to housebuilding, with housing targets developed in partnership with local areas, and said Labour would ensure cleaner rivers by mandatory monitoring on all sewage outlets, introducing automatic fines for discharges paid for by eroding dividends, setting ambitious targets for stopping systematic sewage dumping and ensuring that water bosses are legally held to account for negligence.

Labour鈥檚 support will be seen as a significant boost for the prospects of the move becoming law, given that the levelling up bill is already bogged down in a range of controversies over government planning reforms and insiders are concerned may not be on track to become law in this session of Parliament.

Earlier, prime minister had said the announcement will provide an 拢18bn boost to the economy and support tens of thousands of jobs. Visiting a Taylor Wimpey housing development in Norwich earlier today, he said: 鈥淲e鈥檙e able to do this because previously it was a disproportionate and poorly targeted old EU ruling that blocked these homes.

鈥淭hankfully we can now reverse that, and alongside that we are investing hundreds of millions of pounds to continue protecting and enhancing our precious natural environment.鈥�

好色先生TV鈥檚 sister publication Housing Today鈥檚 has called on the government to act strategically to deal with the issue of nutrient neutrality through its 

The Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities is expected to later today publish the draft amendment to the Bill removing the requirement on Natural England to advise local authorities about nutrient pollution impacts.

Housebuilders have welcomed the plans, but environmental groups have reacted with fury, with the Wildlife Trusts accusing the government of having broken previous promises not to water down environmental regulations. Wildlife charity the RSPB described the decision as a 鈥渘ational scandal鈥� while musician and rivers campaigner Feargal Sharkey said the government鈥檚 pretences on the environment had been 鈥渂lown asunder鈥�.

Under the plans housebuilders will still be expected to contribute mitigate their nutrient pollution from new development, with the government doubling the size of the current Nutrient Mitigation Fund to 拢280m which pays for schemes that offset pollution, and expecting 鈥渓arger developers make an appropriate and fair contribution to this scheme over the coming years鈥�.

The statement said DLUHC is discussing 鈥渢he right structure and approach鈥� for this contribution with the Home Builders Federation.