Historic England says more people need to be consulted about what is being planned
Historic England has called for a shake-up of planning consultations in London after a YouGov poll revealed that half of Londoners think the new towers proposed for the capital will have a negative impact on the skyline.
According to the survey, 48% of Londoners said the 430 tall buildings planned for the capital will not be good for the capital鈥檚 skyline compared to 34% who thought the new schemes will have a positive impact.
The poll, which was undertaken last month, found that more than half of people questioned did not know how to make their voices heard, although 60% felt that residents across the capital should be allowed to have a say on a tall building proposal if it is located close to a historically important site.
Historic England said the survey showed that wider public involvement in planning consultations was needed in the next London Plan.
Its chief executive Duncan Wilson said: 鈥淟ondoners know how special their city is and they know that the future of our capital hangs in the balance. Tall buildings can make an excellent contribution to city life if they are well-placed and well-designed.
鈥淏ut in the wrong places, they can do serious harm. It matters when tall buildings spring up in the wrong places, overshadowing our crescents and squares, our playgrounds and palaces, canals and cathedrals.鈥�
Historic England has said developers and architects need to draw up more plans for lower buildings if London is not to be overwhelmed by 鈥渉opelessly generic鈥� tall buildings.
Earlie this year, Wilson criticised New London Architecture chairman Peter Murray鈥檚 that it was 鈥渋nevitable鈥� more tall buildings will have to go up in the capital if it is to meet an expected population boom.
The heritage body was one of a number of groups to oppose Renzo Piano鈥檚 72-storey Paddington Pole 鈥� later withdrawn by the developer Irvine Sellar 鈥� and Wilson said: 鈥淧eter Murray says shorter and fatter buildings aren鈥檛 the answer to London鈥檚 need for growth. Denser, well-designed and lower developments are exactly the way we can continue the essential architectural traditions of London, while delivering greater capacity for housing and workplaces.鈥�
London鈥檚 population is expected to hit 11 million by 2039 鈥� an increase of 2.5 million on the current number 鈥� and Murray had suggested that 鈥渁ccommodating these sorts of numbers will inevitably demand more tall buildings鈥�.
Peter Murray writes鈥�
So less than half of Londoners think that 430 towers will have a negative impact on the city鈥檚 skyline!
In my experience, Londoners are less sceptical about tall buildings than some commentators might think. Some tall buildings are really popular 鈥� the Shard, the Gherkin, the Leadenhall 好色先生TV. That being said, I would have expected such a bald question to have received a more negative reply; this is a big change in the skyline and sadly not all the buildings will be of the highest quality.
New London Architecture has been campaigning since we first publicised our round-up of proposed tall building in 2014 for broader consultation on the changing skyline. We have asked the Mayor to commission a 3D virtual model of London 鈥� a sort of XBox for planning 鈥� that would allow developers to put their computer model in place and show accurately the impact it would have on the wider city as well as the local streetscape. The virtual model would even be able to assess the impact of wind and on daylight. The City of London already has a model like this and it is proving very useful in the detailed future planning of the eastern cluster of towers.
It is essential that, as the Mayor鈥檚 Design Advisory Group suggested in its Agenda of Good Growth published last month, that we improve the tools which planners and the general public can assess the visual impact of tall buildings. This would not necessarily stop tall buildings being built but help to ensure they are of the right quality and in the right place.
No comments yet