好色先生TV

The former product manager at the firm which manufactured the flammable insulation boards used on Grenfell Tower鈥檚 flawed refurbishment has called the actions of his former employer 鈥渃ompletely unethical鈥�, the inquiry has heard.

Jonathan Roper, who worked at Celotex between May 2012 and April 2016, told Monday鈥檚 hearing how the insulation manufacturer deliberately exploited 鈥渋gnorance鈥� within the construction industry about fire testing regimes to sell its combustible RS5000 product for use on high rise buildings.

It came after Roper admitted last week how Celotex had rebranded its combustible FR5000 insulation, which had failed the fire test needed for use on buildings above 18m in February 2014, as a 鈥榥ew鈥� product called RS5000.

Celotex then marketed RS5000 as safe for installation above 18m on the basis of what Roper repeatedly admitted was a 鈥渕isleading鈥� second fire test in May 2014 which used added components, rather than just the RS5000 by itself. The rebranded insulation was later installed on the 67m Grenfell Tower.

Roper, who at the time was working in his first job since finishing university and had no technical experience, was promoted from assistant product manager to product manager in September 2013 and given the job of 鈥榙eveloping鈥� the new product.

He described how the Celotex team had added a non-combustible magnesium oxide board to the RS5000 insulation for its second fire test to reduce the chance of it failing again.

Inquiry barrister Richard Millet QC asked Roper: 鈥淒id that not strike you at the time as dishonest?鈥� Roper replied: 鈥淵es, it did.鈥�

When asked by Millett why he had gone along with it, Roper replied: 鈥淚 went along with a lot of actions at Celotex that, looking back on reflection, were completely unethical and one that I probably potentially didn鈥檛 consider the impact of at the time.鈥�

He added: 鈥淚 was 22/23, first job, I thought this was standard practice although it did sit very uncomfortably with me.鈥�

Roper told the inquiry he asked fire safety group consultant at the 好色先生TV Research Establishment Phil Clark to replace a photograph of the test rig in a draft test report with a different photograph, telling him 鈥渨e want to show a close up of the condition of our insulation鈥�. But Roper admitted the real reason for asking for the image to be replaced was because it contained evidence of the added magnesium oxide board.

He told the inquiry he 鈥渉ad to come up with a reason to ask for that photograph to be omitted鈥�, adding that he was instructed to 鈥渃reate a false record鈥� of the request by Celotex head of marketing Paul Evans.

The inquiry was later shown a slideshow created by Roper for a Celotex board meeting suggesting routes to market for RS5000 in which he wrote: 鈥淣obody understands the test requirements.鈥�

Millett asked Roper: 鈥淲as the basic point from this slide, that you wanted to get across to the [board meeting], was that the market was ignorant, their ignorance had been exploited by [rival firm] Kingspan and you wanted to do the same?鈥�

Roper replied that although that was not his personal intention, it was the intention of Celotex, adding: 鈥淎nd that鈥檚 because it was worth 拢10m worth of revenues to Kingspan.鈥�

The inquiry heard how Celotex had even concealed the true nature of RS5000 from its own sales team. Roper told Millett that the view among senior staff was that 鈥渋t would confuse the message鈥� if the sales team knew that RS5000 was in fact a rebranded version of FR5000.

Celotex admitted in its opening submission to the inquiry that there were 鈥渃ertain discrepancies鈥� between RS5000鈥檚 successful BS8414 test, which is needed to certify it as safe for use on high rise buildings, in May 2014 as part of a cladding system and the description of that test in the BRE鈥檚 test and classification reports.

But it added that another test had been commissioned in April 2018 following the Grenfell fire which replicated 鈥渁s closely as possible鈥� the system described in the BRE test report and in Celotex鈥檚 marketing literature, and this test had passed.

Celotex also said that none of the key employees involved in the testing development and marketing of RS5000 remain employed by the firm.

The second module of the inquiry is focusing on the role of the refurbishment鈥檚 materials in the 2017 fire at Grenfell Tower, which killed 72 people.

The inquiry continues.