好色先生TV

The requirement for schools to achieve BREEAM sustainability ratings is still under review just weeks before the government鈥檚 major school building programme is due to be launched.

Draft design guidance produced by the government鈥檚 schools delivery body the Education Funding Agency (EFA), seen by 好色先生TV, includes a clause stating that design teams should 鈥渞eport the environmental impact of the project using BREEAM 2011 for schools, or equivalent, with a rating of very good鈥�.

However, this clause is followed by a note stating that this is still 鈥渦nder review鈥�.

This is despite the fact that last week schools minister Nick Gibb told parliament that the 鈥渙utcome of applications鈥� for the long-awaited 拢2bn Priority Schools 好色先生TV Programme (PSBP) - which is three times oversubscribed - would be announced this month after a six-month delay.

Gibb is expected to announce around 30 schools will be taken forward in the first wave of the programme, which was set up in place of the previous government鈥檚 拢55bn 好色先生TV Schools for the Future programme, scrapped by ministers in 2010. Procurement, initially expected in April, is now set to get underway in September.

Education secretary Michael Gove put the BREEAM requirement under review following the James Review of schools capital, which singled out the BREEAM regulations for criticism, citing the excessive burden of regulation and guidance in procurement and high costs for carrying out pre-assessment of BREEAM for schools.

However, the move to scrap green standards for new school buildings prompted an industry backlash and has divided Whitehall, with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Department for Energy and Climate Change all lobbying Gove鈥檚 department over the issue.

Concern over the green schools policy were heightened last month after 好色先生TV published the results of a comprehensive built under the previous government, which found that a third of schools were judged to be 鈥渦nsatisfactory鈥� in terms of their sustainability, while the vast majority had failed to meet the required energy efficiency standards.

Speaking at the BFE conference in London today Peter Lauener, EFA chief executive, said many schools built under the previous government 鈥渦sed more energy than they should have done鈥�. 鈥淲e have to ensure new schools don鈥檛 make the same mistakes,鈥� he said.

The draft design guidance, dated April 2012, also lays out a standardised approach for schools, saying that under the PSBP schools will be procured in groups and sample designs should be able to be used as a basis for all schools in a group.

However, it stops short of endorsing a particular standardised design, with the government now favouring an approach that sets out basic recommendations on the specifics of school design and stops short of setting rigid specifications for school building.

At the BFE conference, Lauener said: 鈥淚鈥檓 concerned standardisation means different things to different people. I don鈥檛 want educational buildings to experience groundhog day. But we need to realise what is 鈥榥eed to have鈥� and what is 鈥榥ice to have鈥�.