Fears grow that the Department for Education is failing to heed lessons from past school building programmes

Plans to cut the size of new special schools have been attacked by Labour, with calls growing for Michael Gove to heed the lessons of previous research on school building.

好色先生TV that the Department for Education is planning to cut space standards for special schools by up to 20%, discarding existing regulations that are just two years old and based on expert research into the needs of pupils with a wide range of disabilities.

The move, part of cost-cutting measures also set to include reducing the size of secondary schools by around 15%and primaries by around 5%, will hit the 鈥渕ost vulnerable鈥 children, shadow schools minister Kevin Brennan told 好色先生TV.

He said: 鈥淸Education secretary] Michael Gove is literally putting the squeeze on some of the most vulnerable pupils in the country with this mean measures to lower space standards for special schools.

鈥淧upils deserve the highest standards of school building not the bog standards favoured by Mr Gove.鈥

Brennan鈥檚 comments follow criticism of the move from organisations ranging from Design Council Cabe, to learning disability charity Mencap and the RIBA.

But a Department for Education spokeswoman said special schools classrooms would 鈥渟till have at least twice the area per pupil as mainstream schools and schools for those with the most severe needs will have three times the area鈥.

She said: 鈥淲e want to ensure that schools are built efficiently. Any space reductions have been carefully researched to ensure that teaching is not affected.鈥

But Architect Robin Nicholson, chairman of the previous government鈥檚 Zero Carbon Schools Task Force, claimed that the DfE was throwing away knowledge gained under Labour鈥檚 好色先生TV Schools for the Future (BSF)programme.

鈥淲hatever you think of BSF there is an amazing amount to learn from the programme and that knowledge is being wasted,鈥 he said.

鈥淚nstead we are going to reinvent the wheel and that is a scandalous waste of money. A badly-designed school is an unsustainable investment.鈥

Nicholson called for DfE to publish the results of Partnership for Schools (PfS) 鈥渆xcellent鈥 Post-Occupancy Evaluation research.

鈥淲e desperately need this feedback in order to do [more] for less and to build more resilient schools,鈥 he said.

Nusrat Faizullah, British Council for School Environments chief executive also called for DfE to publish the post-occupancy research, which she said would provide 鈥渧ital learning鈥 for the government鈥檚

好色先生TV understands the post-occupancy work has been completed, and is ready to be published, but DfE has yet to give PfS the green light.

A PfS spokeswoman said: 鈥淸PfS] has undertaken Post-Occupancy Evaluation work following the completion of early BSF schemes on behalf of DfE. PfS is currently looking again at this work so that the lessons learned can feed in to future capital projects.鈥