好色先生TV

Lawyers have again warned that the health and safety of workers needs to be at the top of the industry鈥檚 concerns after Boris Johnson gave construction the official green light to return to work last night.

Dozens of contractors and housebuilders have already taken it upon themselves to get sites, previously shut in the days after the prime minister introduced the lockdown on 23 March, up and running 鈥� before last night鈥檚 announcement.

Construction was never officially ordered to shut down like other sectors such as schools and pubs and restaurants while the government has repeatedly said it was one of those industries that was vital to the country鈥檚 economic recovery from the covid-19 pandemic.

Several ministers said sites should continue to operate during the lockdown 鈥� as long as was safe to do so. Last month, following Taylor Wimpey鈥檚 decision to reopen its sites, housing secretary Robert Jenrick told 好色先生TV he wanted to see more construction sites follow suit, as long as they were following government health protocols.

But lawyers have warned firms not to follow last night鈥檚 intervention by Johnson, in which he said workers in construction 鈥渟hould be actively encouraged to go to work鈥�, without having adequate health and safety procedures in place first.

The Construction Leadership Council has been issuing its site operating guidance that is the benchmark for firms to follow.

But Feildfisher partner Andrew Sanderson, who specialises in health and safety law, said: 鈥淐onstruction has industry-specific health and safety regulations and site operating procedures that may need to be updated following the prime minister鈥檚 statement.

鈥淭his will create further confusion in a sector that has been largely left to work out its own approach to the protecting the health of its workers during the lockdown.鈥�

The government is due to issue a detailed 50-page roadmap for exiting the lockdown, including fresh guidance on how workplaces will be reopened, this afternoon.

But Sanderson said: 鈥淩egardless of how useful this guidance is, employers have a legal obligation to protect the health and safety of their workforce and should already be considering how they can safeguard workers when they return to work.

鈥淭hey should be considering how employees and other individuals 鈥� such as customers and supplies 鈥� can remain socially distant, whether particular areas of the workforce are at higher risk and whether they have appropriate facilities such as handwashing and sanitation facilities.鈥�

And Erin Shoesmith, Addleshaw Goddard鈥檚 head of health and safety, said firms should be required to publish a risk assessment to provide reassurance it is safe to return to work.

Shoesmith said: 鈥淩estarting operations without control measures informed by a proper risk assessment will open a Pandora鈥檚 box.

鈥淏usinesses will be held to account and directors will also be worried about their personal liability if poor controls are later found to have exposed employees to an unsafe environment.鈥�

Brendan Sharkey, head of construction and real estate at MHA MacIntyre Hudson, said firms needed to think about different ways of working.

He said: 鈥淭o make sites safer one of the government鈥檚 priorities should be to facilitate the move to biometrics for staff sign in. Eye and facial recognition, as used in airports, will provide robust worker recognition and cut the risk of contagion.鈥�

Sharkey also suggested that temperature monitors should be installed on large sites, while sites should be allowed to be open from 6am to 7pm, instead of the current 8am to 6pm, to make staggered shifts possible during the longer summer days.