好色先生TV

Construction firms have been urged to quit their litigious ways and to collaborate more, after a new survey shared exclusively with 好色先生TV revealed disputes were still rife in the industry.

The survey compiled by the National 好色先生TV Specification (NBS) found the two most common causes of dispute in the industry were disagreements over extension of time and the value of final accounts, cited by 50% and 44% of respondents respectively.

The lion鈥檚 share of disputes is between clients and main contractors, according to 76% of respondents, while 29% said they had been involved in a dispute between a main contractor and a subcontractor.

The survey was taken by 981 respondents across the construction industry, including consultants and advisers (60%), contractors (25%) and clients (15%).

Almost half of respondents (44%) said they had had to deal with at least one dispute over the past 12 months, with one in ten dealing with three or more.

Speaking to 好色先生TV, Adrian Malleson, head of research, analysis and forecasting at NBS, said disputes in construction were 鈥渁lmost a normal way of working鈥�.

He said: 鈥淚t鈥檚 more of a cultural feature of the construction sector that disputes are almost a normal way of working. The fact that the number of disputes hasn鈥檛 gone down is disappointing but perhaps predictable.

鈥淭he construction industry - and delivery for clients - would be better if firms were less litigious and if disputes were addressed as early as possible. Engaging in collaborative working can only be helpful.鈥�

Malleson added that some survey respondents claimed contractors submitted sub-economic tenders, with 鈥渄isputes being used as a way to get some margin鈥�.

Other issues in dispute included loss and expensive, defective work, withholding payment, contractor鈥檚 design work and engineers鈥� instructions.

The survey shows that while a majority of respondents used collaboration in some or all of their projects in the last 12 months, 38% said they didn鈥檛 collaborate at all.

These findings were despite the fact respondents said collaboration had a number of benefits.

Just under 90% said collaboration was used for high value projects, with 48% using collaboration on low value projects.

Regarding BIM, 58% said their organisation recognised it as being contractually binding.