Chief executive says contractor should have threatened to 鈥榰p sticks鈥� during construction of Scottish parliament

Bovis Lend Lease ought to have threatened to quit the 拢431m Scottish parliament scheme during its construction, according to the boss of the firm.

Adrian Chamberlain, Lend Lease鈥檚 chief executive for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, said the contractor ought to have stood its ground when it became clear that the contract was unlikely to be completed on time or to budget.

In an interview with 好色先生TV, Chamberlain, who joined Lend Lease from telecoms firm Cable & Wireless last October, said: 鈥淭here were times when we could have been tougher than we were. We repeatedly told people that the cost estimates were in jeopardy and that the constant changes by the client were threatening the integrity of the scheme. We never threatened to up sticks, never took them by the lapels or slapped them round a bit to create a crisis. Possibly, with hindsight, we should have done.鈥�

Chamberlain said the company would 鈥渋nevitably鈥� take on similar prestigious jobs again but would need to show 鈥渕ore aggressive intervention earlier鈥�.

He said: 鈥淭hat鈥檚 not a criticism at all of the management on the ground but a criticism of us generally in assessing what we were doing and supporting people on the ground. We did everything you would reasonably expect us to do.鈥�

Chamberlain added that the Bovis team on the scheme did a 鈥渇antastic job鈥�.

We never took took anyone by the lapels or slapped them

Adrian Chamberlain

He said: 鈥淲e strongly believe we have delivered an iconic building, which will be recognised when the short-term controversy subsides.鈥�

Chamberlain鈥檚 comments follow the publication of a report on the parliament, which was officially opened by the Queen in October.

The report, by the office of the independent civil service commissioner, cleared the civil servants involved in procuring and managing the scheme of misconduct. He said they had acted in good faith.

But the author of the report, Alistair Macdonald, a civil service commissioner, did criticise the handling of key aspects of the project. He accused civil servants of making 鈥渞ose-tinted鈥� judgments, of breaching European Union procurement rules and of lacking transparency. He also questioned whether the civil servants possessed the skills to oversee such a scheme.