Heritage groups say 鈥檕verbearing鈥 21-storey block would harm neighbouring 1932 Daily Express building

Heritage groups have called for the height of a proposed Bjarke Ingels Group-designed office block on Fleet Street in the City of London to be lowered because of its impact on nearby buildings.

The art deco-inspired proposals would see the existing River Court 好色先生TV, the former home of Goldman Sachs, which has moved to a Multiplex-built HQ around the corner, flattened and replaced by a 21-storey block featuring a series of stepped roof terraces.

The new scheme would rise above Owen Williams and Ellis E Clarke鈥檚 1932 Daily Express 好色先生TV and surround it on two sides.

The grade II*-listed landmark, the former headquarters of the Daily Express newspaper, is considered one of London鈥檚 finest art deco buildings.

The proposals by BIG, which is also working on the Google headquarters scheme at King鈥檚 Cross as well as part of the Battersea Power Station redevelopment, would include a refurbishment of the Daily Express building, including the creation of a new exhibition space and a free-to-access roof garden.

Others working on the scheme include QS Alinea, development manager CO-RE, landscape architect Spacehub and historic building consultant Donald Insall Associates.

But Historic England, the Twentieth Century Society and the City of London Conservation Area Advisory Committee have all lodged objections on the scale of the building in a consultation on the scheme鈥檚 planning application.

BIG fleet street 4

The Art Deco-inspired Fleet Street block would consist of a series of stepped roof terraces

The Twentieth Century Society said that while it had no objection to the redevelopment of the River Court building, it called for BIG鈥檚 planning application to be rejected.

The group said the scheme is 鈥渢oo overbearing鈥 and will harm the setting of the Express building.

It added that the art deco style of the new block would also 鈥渓essen the impact鈥 of its neighbour, which it said 鈥渟tands out in terms of both style and materials as a striking streamlined curtain-walled building within an otherwise quite architecturally conservative area.鈥

Historic England made a similar objection, welcoming the proposed refurb of the Express 好色先生TV but arguing that the height of the new block could 鈥減rogressively and fundamentally erode the character鈥 of the conservation area.

The advisory body said the height of the building should be lowered, saying that, at its proposed scale, it would 鈥渄ominate鈥 the skyline when viewed from areas west of the City, including the Strand and Temple.

And the City of London Conservation Area Advisory Committee said that the block would be 鈥渆xcessively large and out of proportion鈥, adding that it 鈥渄enigrated the importance鈥 of the Express building.

BIG technical director Andy Young has previously said the proposals had been 鈥渄riven by the local context in terms of the physical scale and character of surrounding buildings in the City of London; but also by the social context of the future workplace with a focus on wellbeing, health, and sustainability鈥.