Legal views 鈥� Page 98
-
CommentLook who鈥檚 footing the bill
Using outsiders to bankroll disputes has been treated with some suspicion by the courts. But the construction industry would be well advised to explore it
-
CommentYoghurt in a pea soup
Guess what? We鈥檝e got another case in which the parties started work on the basis of a letter of intent. The slight difference in this case is that it concerns M眉ller twin pots
-
CommentIdentity crises
Although name borrowing may seem like a simple concept, it can lead to conflicting issues for all parties involved
-
CommentRICS consultancy form: On surprisingly good form
The new crop of RICS standard contract are about to make quantity surveyors鈥� lives a lot easier
-
CommentI is for indemnity
The A-Z of construction law -聽Our instant course in legal concepts continues by asking what exactly is an indemnity and how would you spot one in a contract?
-
CommentConcurrent delays: Doing the splits
The City Inn case throws up a logical approach to granting extensions of time due to concurrent delays 鈥� if the delay has two causes, then why not apportion responsibility accordingly?
-
CommentMe and my pod
The podcast was fun. First of its kind here at 好色先生TV. Rudi Klein and yours truly were interviewed by 好色先生TV鈥檚 ace interviewer, Chlo毛 McCulloch, about the government鈥檚 changes to payment rules.
-
CommentLiability: Strictly speaking
Do you know the difference between strict and absolute duties and no-fault liability? If not, then read on before you commit yourself to undertaking either
-
CommentThings to take into account
Project bank accounts are in the spotlight again. If you use one yourself, make sure you鈥檙e aware of all the pros and cons, particularly with regard to insolvency
-
CommentThat bubble, reputation
What happened at BAE should have us all thinking about not just the legality of what we do but the morality. Our good names can so easily be damaged, even lost
-
Comment
The villains of the piece
Rudi Klein聽So should the 112 firms accused by the OFT be hung, drawn and quartered? Or were there some mitigating circumstances 鈥�
-
CommentDon鈥檛 get your knickers in a twist
In its enthusiasm to paint our industry as a bunch of dodgy operators, the Office of Fair Trading has got the whole cover pricing and bid rigging business mixed up
-
CommentExclusion clauses: A chink of light
Are exclusion clauses enforceable? Hitherto, the courts have shed little light on the matter, but a recent Court of Appeal decision makes things much clearer
-
CommentAre you listening?
Put four fabulous speakers in a room and get some of the country鈥檚 top adjudicators to sit down in front of them. The result is a fascinating conference we can all learn from
-
CommentNEC: Smooth operator
The Olympic Delivery Authority has chosen the NEC contract in the hope that it will keep the job moving efficiently. But it will only work if it鈥檚 well enough resourced
-
CommentConfidentiality in mediation: Do the decent thing
It really can鈥檛 be stressed enough that what goes on between consenting parties in a mediation is nobody鈥檚 business but theirs. If you don鈥檛 believe that, consider the following case
-
CommentA sackload of trouble
Can a party to an adjudication introduce evidence that wasn鈥檛 previously disclosed if it fundamentally alters the original claim? The answer used to be no, but a recent judgment may have reversed this
-
CommentSplendid isolation
Mediation is an excellent alternative to court proceedings, but these days the two forms of dispute resolution are getting mixed up. Mediation should be left to its own devices
-
CommentThe land of make-believe
The building industry should sit up and take notice of the McCartney/Mills divorce settlement: there are some valuable lessons to be learned, particularly when it comes to putting your side of the story to the court
-
CommentAldi vs WSP Group: Piercing the cover field
Many people automatically assume that the insurer will pay out simply because the premium has been paid when a claim is made. But there are certain grounds on which the insurer can refuse to pay