Legal views – Page 87

  • Comment

    Hamish Lal: Bare realities

    2010-05-21T00:00:00Z

    Hamish Lal The final part of our series on the nuclear decommissioning sector looks at the kind of risks the industry is grappling with today – including that the money will run out

  • Comment

    Expert determination: A short cut through a swamp

    2010-05-14T00:00:00Z

    Plumping for expert determination to resolve a dispute may sound like a quick, cheap, hassle-free alternative to adjudication or litigation. But it ain’t necessarily so

  • Comment

    All things considered

    2010-05-14T00:00:00Z

    Adjudicators have it drummed into them that they should decide the dispute in the notice of adjudication. Here’s a case that shows there is some room for flexibility

  • Comment

    Judges unleashed

    2010-05-07T00:00:00Z

    Simon Tolson Unlike the restrained and remote judges of the past, many now snap at the ankles of the advocates to ensure cases proceed in the way they should

  • Tony Bingham
    Comment

    This one’s on you

    2010-05-07T00:00:00Z

    Tony Bingham Tolent clauses, which make the party that refers an adjudication pay all the legal costs, are to be outlawed by the Construction Act … but a judge has just got there first

  • Comment

    Running out of common sense

    2010-05-07T00:00:00Z

    Shy Jackson One area where the judges are struggling to make up their minds is the ‘without prejudice’ rule. Here’s a rundown of the arguments, and the spats, among our learned friends

  • Comment

    Your next assignment

    2010-05-07T00:00:00Z

    James Duckworth and Charles Jakeman Transferring construction agreement benefits between parties requires care and attention, especially when dealing with the ‘no loss’ defence

  • Comment

    In praise of doing less: adjudication scheme

    2010-04-30T00:00:00Z

    The scheme for adjudication is being redrafted to fit the new (deep breath) Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act. If only they would write it on just one page

  • Comment

    The reckoning

    2010-04-30T00:00:00Z

    Fiona Gill and Mark Roach So what did the Labour party do for (or to) construction during the past 13 years? And what will happen if the Conservatives take over?

  • James Bessey
    Comment

    A pain in the NEC

    2010-04-30T00:00:00Z

    Disputes on NEC projects are on the rise, so if you don’t want to find yourself in a bind, here are some points to be aware of when using this contract

  • Comment

    Nuclear contracts: Ending in tiers

    2010-04-30T00:00:00Z

    The second of our three-part series on the nuclear decommissioning sector looks at the target-cost clauses of tier two contracts – their benefits and pitfalls

  • Ian Yule
    Comment

    About this turbine you sold me

    2010-04-23T00:00:00Z

    An NEC form for the supply of high-value items has arrived on the scene to compete with the handful of contracts that already provide this facility. What’s the verdict?

  • Comment

    What do you mean, ‘as far as possible’?

    2010-04-23T00:00:00Z

    The Supreme Court has been looking at how to interpret words. It favours looking at commercial intention rather than literal meaning – but are intentions any easier to fathom?

  • Simon Lewis
    Comment

    Bribery Bill: Greasing the wheels of commerce

    2010-04-23T00:00:00Z

    Bribery is endemic in many parts of the world where British firms do business, but any that succumb to it will soon face fairly horrific penalties

  • Tony Bingham
    Comment

    Collatoral contracts: The unkindness of strangers

    2010-04-23T00:00:00Z

    Collateral contracts are supposed to protect those not party to a contractual set-up. They work, but they also introduce flint-hearted button counters into the equation

  • Tony Bingham
    Comment

    Match of the day: Mott MacDonald vs Multiplex

    2010-04-16T00:00:00Z

    Mott MacDonald vs Multiplex is a game of two halves – first there’s the disputing, then there’s coughing up the legal costs. Alas, these are so high, neither wants to call it a draw

  • Comment

    Feeling the squeeze

    2010-04-16T00:00:00Z

    Be careful how you go about recovering money that is owed you – you might fall foul of the Protection from Harassment Act and end up paying them

  • Rudi Klein
    Comment

    Scheming minds

    2010-04-16T00:00:00Z

    The government has released a consultation on the Scheme for Construction Contracts that proposes big changes in the industry’s rules. Here’s what I think of them …

  • Comment

    Off half-cock

    2010-04-09T00:00:00Z

    You’d think that getting the contract right before beginning work was just common sense. Especially since, if you don’t, the only people likely to win are the lawyers …

  • Comment

    Going nuclear: contracts for decommissioning work

    2010-04-09T00:00:00Z

    Everything you wanted to know about the nuclear decommissioning sector but were afraid to ask – explained to you in a three-part series starting with this overview