Legal views 鈥� Page 80
-
Comment
Designing out risk
This is the first high-profile prosecution of an architect under the CDM regulations for a site death, and it shows how the onus is on designers to reduce health and safety risks
-
CommentWhy TUPE ruling is bad news for purchasers of pre-pack administrations
Ruling could prove costly for buyers of companies in administration as they will now inherit employee contracts
-
CommentHow can you exit your Libyan contracts?
Guidance on 鈥檉orce majeure鈥� and the proper steps to take if you need to exit contracts
-
Comment
Network rail shake-up: light at the end of the tunnel
Roy McNulty鈥檚 interim report on how to get value for money from the railway sector suggests that train operating companies are set to be turned into quasi developers
-
CommentMichael Gove: The bad boy in school
The education secretary got his knuckles rapped for bad-temperedly tearing up the BSF rule book. But it won鈥檛 stop him getting his way
-
CommentBack to basics with professional indemnity claims
There may be any number of clever ways to reduce the risk of professional indemnity claims. But why not start with the simplest?
-
CommentO is for ownership, P is for performance
Zone out whenever someone uses legal jargon with you? Here鈥檚 a handy bluffer鈥檚 guide with a look at ownership and performance
-
CommentIf you want my advice 鈥�
A couple of part-time developers were relying on their QS鈥� advice. The trouble is, he didn鈥檛 advise them about a specification error that made the project turn a loss
-
Comment
Common mistakes in鈥� lump sum contracts
The latest in a series of dos and don鈥檛s on major projects highlights the provisions in a lump sum contract that mean the price offered by the contractor is far from fixed
-
CommentOnce upon a time
The law determining whether there should be an extension of time when both employer and contractor are to blame for a delay in construction, is in disarray
-
CommentWhat the High Court victory means for BSF
Six local authorities won a partial victory against the government鈥檚 decision to scrap BSF. What happens next?
-
CommentA guide to zero-tolerance in the workplace
Laing O鈥橰ourke is not the only employer to take a tough stance on IT misuse, but how far can employers go and how can they ensure staff are treated fairly?
-
Comment
House rules
锘緾onsultants are at a greater risk of being sued in the downturn, but if you follow these basic rules, you can mitigate a potential claim
-
CommentRobinson vs PE Jones: Duty in tort
锘緼 quirk in the law of limitation means a claim for economic loss under a contract has a different time limit from the same claim brought in tort
-
CommentJust cause and impediment
锘縔our subcontractor just isn鈥檛 up to scratch, so you fire him and hire someone else 鈥� but in doing so you stand accused of repudiating the contract. So what are your options?
-
-
CommentPromises, promises
锘縄ndemnities should oblige another party to take responsibility for your loss, but not if the wording gives them room to wriggle out of paying up
-
CommentHow to stay out of hell
If we treated design as a risk management issue, we鈥檇 probably save ourselves vast amounts of time and money sorting out the mess at the construction phase
-
Comment
Love thy neighbour
锘縏he Scottish planning system encourages inclusivity and good relationships between developers and communities. Now, that approach will be backed up by law
-
CommentHow losers win
It truly is a topsy turvy world when some companies manage to profit from failing to win a bid for a contract. But that鈥檚 European regulations for you 鈥�