Legal views 鈥� Page 78
-
CommentQ is for quantum, R is for repudiation
Don鈥檛 like the terms of a contract? Michael Conroy Harris continues our jargon-busting series and explains how you can repudiate it or make a quantum claim
-
CommentWhat鈥檚 the returns policy?
If you refer a case for adjudication but don鈥檛 like the look of the appointed adjudicator, can you send him packing and ask for another one?
-
Comment
PFIs: Do your paperwork
A PFI acceptance certificate is a crucial document but you need to know how it differs from an acceptance certificate issued on a traditional construction project
-
CommentIt鈥檒l all come out in the wash
Ever since the Proceeds of Crime Act came into effect, construction has feared unwittingly getting caught up in money laundering. But recent cases should make us worry less
-
CommentWorking 9 to 5: The Agency Workers Regulations 2010
The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 come into effect in October this year, improving working conditions for temporary workers. So what does this mean for you?
-
CommentNovation: Let's innovate
A client novates its design team in order to offload risk to the contractor, but in doing so it also loses access to consultants who can offer vital advice. So what鈥檚 the alternative?
-
CommentThe new Construction Act: The daft draft
A lot of people say a clause in the new Construction Act approves the pre-dispute allocation of legal costs - the opposite of what was intended. Let鈥檚 get it sorted
-
Comment
Unhealthy competition: Commercial property agreements and the Competition Act
New restrictions for the property market came into play last month meaning that housebuilders, developers and even owners will have to watch out
-
CommentTeCSA rules! OK?
With a new Construction Act on the way, adjudicators are going to have to up their game. Luckily, one nominating body has updated its rules in anticipation
-
Comment
The Defective Premises Act: What hole?
Hole? What hole? Ben Worthington, who acted for the project manager on Jenson vs Faux, discussed by Tony Bingham, says the Defective Premises Act has been properly restricted to new dwellings
-
CommentThe Defective Premises Act: The hole truth
The lovely new home you just bought is covered by the Defective Premises Act if it鈥檚 a new dwelling. But if it鈥檚 a massive refurb job, you might find yourself in need of a spade
-
CommentDamn the expense
The relationship between housebuilders and the NHBC generally works well. But sometimes the home warranty provider can be a bit gung-ho - and go way over the top on costs
-
Comment
Up, up and away
In tough times, adjudication is increasingly seen as too costly. An escalation dispute procedure offers a quick, cheap alternative that preserves the business relationship
-
Comment
Going for broke
Adjudication can help companies鈥� cashflow, but what happens in cases of insolvency when there is no cash to flow?
-
Comment
No more privileges
The Supreme Court has stripped expert witnesses of their immunity from prosecution. But could the fear of being sued make them less likely to admit their mistakes?
-
CommentIf the cap fits
A couple who tried to cap the costs in an oral 鈥檆ost plus鈥� contract have received short shrift from the Court of Appeal. Here鈥檚 why 鈥�
-
Comment
Hold it right there
A recent case shows that fraud is not the only ground upon which a call on an on-demand performance bond can be restrained by an injunction
-
CommentContract advice: clauses that risk unravelling your claim
Certain combinations of clauses may have profound consequences for the unsuspecting contractor or subcontractor if the terms are not strictly complied with
-
CommentDemolition: Hold off on that wrecking ball
A heritage group has won a major legal battle regarding controls over demolition. It means nearly all demolition now needs planning permission
-
CommentDos and Don'ts: Interface issues
In the latest in our series on dos and don鈥檛s, we look at interface issues - what they are and how to manage them when they arise