Legal views 鈥� Page 72
-
CommentQatar's construction boom: The legal risks
With FIFA 2022 and multibillion infrastructure projects in the pipeline, many firms are heading for Qatar 鈥� but there are legal risks within contracts to be aware of
-
CommentEnergy Act, Green Deal and EPCs: Key legal points to remember
From April 2012 new regulations relating to the energy performance of buildings come into play, ahead of the roll-out of the Green Deal in October
-
CommentLeander vs Mulalley: In your own time, gentlemen, please
A contractor tries to claim loss because the subcontractor isn鈥檛 鈥榞etting on with it鈥�. But what if the subbie is working hard - only to a different clock?
-
Comment
Leander vs Mulalley: Getting contracts right first time
Tony Bingham outlines the mess that Mulalley got in over a badly drafted contract - here鈥檚 how to avoid these pitfalls and side-step costly adjudication
-
CommentThe importance of witnesses: Su谩rez vs Evra
When Luis Su谩rez ended up in front of the FA tribunal in the race row with Patrice Evra, both appeared as witnesses - and what we heard determined the case
-
CommentGalliford Try vs Lanes Group: Premature adjudication
An adjudicator who outlines a preliminary view needs to make sure he鈥檚 not reached a final decision too soon
-
CommentGalliford Try vs Lanes Group: Forum shopping
The practice of 鈥榝orum shopping鈥� as mentioned in Tony鈥檚 article may be unappealing to some, but any attempt to legislate against it will cause a trolleyful of problems
-
CommentMeddling with VAT invoice clauses can sting you
Payment notices are being complicated by lawyers meddling with clauses relating to VAT invoices. This could invalidate the contract and lead to some nasty surprise
-
CommentDeals in writing: Noel's house party poopers
TV presenter Noel Edmonds learnt the hard way that if a deal鈥檚 not put in writing, it鈥檚 a no deal
-
CommentThe practices of funders' lawyers in 2011
Funders鈥� lawyers are imposing onerous terms on contractors, passing them off as 鈥榤arket standard鈥�. Here鈥檚 the kind of shenanigans they got up to last year
-
CommentLitigation: The long and short of it
Eternity is very long, said Woody Allen - especially towards the end. Here鈥檚 a case that proves the point
-
CommentThe legal view: 2011
Not all of this year鈥檚 cuts were bad but not all of the government鈥檚 actions were positive either. Here鈥檚 a round-up of 2011鈥檚 legal developments 鈥�
-
CommentSuspending works for non-payment: What's changed?
The right to suspend works for non-payment has been dramatically broadened and it could have a big impact on relations between main contractors and their subbies
-
CommentContracts and business common sense
The problem with common sense is that it鈥檚 not that common. At least now the Supreme Court has affirmed that you can use it if a contract is drafted in an ambiguous way
-
CommentDispute boards should decide, not recommend
Americans like dispute boards to recommend not make binding decisions, but over here we like a bit more certainty
-
Comment
The ghosts of Libya: The legal landscape
If you have a business interest in Libya, you鈥檒l be on the edge of your seat wanting to know how the new legal landscape is shaping up there
-
CommentJCT consultation: Life cycle considerations
Should life cycle considerations be built into building contracts and project planning? The JCT is launching an industry consultation with this in mind, so start thinking
-
CommentRainy Sky vs Kookmin Bank: Common sense prevails
Be reassured that commercial agreements you make will be upheld in a common sense way by the courts, as demonstrated by the Supreme Court鈥檚 recent decision on this case
-
CommentCarillion vs Smith: Don't take part if you don't agree
If you don鈥檛 think an adjudication should take place, don鈥檛 just go ahead with it - either press pause or get out altogether