Legal views 鈥� Page 22
-
CommentReducing risk through AI
In the first of two articles on the applications of AI聽 in construction law, Simon Tolson and Stacy Sinclair discuss risk management
-
CommentCase in focus: expert evidence
Ted Lowery considers the consequences of disregarding Part 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules
-
Comment好色先生TV construction regulations are not the same in England and Scotland: what you need to know
Developers and contractors in England and Scotland need to be aware of the differences in two separate pieces of building regulation.
-
CommentCan irremediable defects prevent practical completion?
Lindy Patterson reviews the lessons of a recent case
-
CommentThe devil is in the detail in pre-contractual documents
Louis Peacock-Young on the risks of appending pre-contractual documents to construction contracts
-
CommentLost profits? Then prove it
A damages claim for delay can include head office overheads and lost profit if certain conditions are met
-
CommentThe complications of dual role clauses for adjudicators
Akin Akinbode and Tracey Summerell consider whether adjudicators should wear two hats
-
CommentBuild safe, not sorry
Stephanie Canham examines how the revised 好色先生TV Regulations to limit cladding material use will affect construction disputes
-
CommentLegal: Not so privileged
Assuming that legal privilege extends to in-house lawyers can be a costly error
-
CommentWhen is it good to call out on fraud in adjudication proceedings?
If you鈥檙e going to use an allegation of fraud as grounds for a stay of payment on an adjudication award, get the timing right, writes Tony Bingham
-
CommentLet's make payments safer
Project bank accounts are gaining momentum as objections fall away 鈥� it鈥檚 time to make them mandatory
-
CommentCase in focus: Adjudication
Ted Lowery considers a challenge to the contents of a notice of adjudication
-
CommentProcurement's progress: new approaches are leading the way in construction
David Mosey comes up with five good reasons to be cheerful about procurement in 2019
-
CommentDispute resolution after Brexit
Claire Stockford, Iain Drummond and Caitlin McLean of Shepherd and Wedderburn weigh Brexit鈥檚 implications for dispute resolution
-
CommentWhat lies in store for the future of developments, post-Faraday?
A recent Court of Appeal judgement聽provides a useful steer for public bodies and developers to consider the overall purpose and intention of a development agreement
-
Comment2019: The year ahead in construction
Sheena Sood聽previews what 2019 will hold for the construction industry from a legal point of view
-
Comment2018 in legal - the year of the agreement
While one particular agreement dominated this year鈥檚 headlines, there was plenty on offer from other agreements
-
CommentVR: Is what you see what you get?
In the eighth part of our series on new technology, James Worthington considers the impact virtual and augmented reality could have on construction projects and some legal issues that may arise
-
CommentLegal: From Russia without love
International construction arbitration practitioners often stress the positives of arbitration: using the so-called 鈥渇ive Es鈥� of efficiency, expedition, expertise, evenhandedness and enforceability. The Russian Supreme Court has placed enforceability in serious doubt by holding that a standard form ICC arbitration clause is unenforceable under Russian law because there was ...
-
CommentCase in focus: Adjudication
Ted Lowery on聽declaratory proceedings arising out of a PFI contract聽