Legal views 鈥� Page 19
-
CommentLegal: A contract means what it says
Robert Akenhead explains how a literal interpretation of wording sent a contractor鈥檚 argument off the rails in a case on disallowed costs
-
CommentParent companies beware: you may still be liable
A cautionary tale for companies with subsidiaries operating overseas
-
CommentA new model for mediation?
Hot on the heels of TeCSA鈥檚 low-cost mediation service, the CIC has included a fixed-fee option in its new model agreement
-
CommentCuriouser and curiouser: how the role of the adjudicator is becoming more complex
Adjudicators are asked to resolve increasingly complex issues, so the RICS鈥� new rolling training programme is most welcome
-
CommentDouble your money or bust: Beware of retention of title clauses
These can leave a contractor paying twice for materials if a subcontractor goes bust
-
CommentCase in focus: TQ Delta LLC vs Zyxel Communications UK Ltd & Anor
Ted Lowery considers the lessons of an application to substitute one expert for another
-
CommentAre lenders becoming more confident about offsite?
Stephanie Canham considers the changing climate on funding issues for MMC and modular construction
-
CommentRetentions: Is the endgame in sight?
Rudi Klein offers an update on the plan to reform retention practice in the construction industry with a brand-new system
-
CommentTall buildings: Housing versus heritage
In the first of our new series on the legal considerations of constructing tall buildings,聽Joanna Bassett considers the issues around planning permission聽
-
CommentMears v Costplan: Identifying practical completion
Steven Carey looks at one of the first cases to apply the recent Mears vs Costplan ruling on identifying practical completion聽
-
CommentStormy waters: Issues when paying subcontractors directly
Sarah Leaver on a boatbuilding case that highlights problems in paying subcontractors directly
-
CommentNEC4 Alliancing Contract: Let鈥檚 do this together
Sheena Sood examines how the NEC4 Alliancing Contract approaches project risks, liabilities, insurance and disputes
-
CommentCase in focus: JJ Rhatigan & Co (UK) Ltd vs Rosemary Lodge Developments Ltd
Ted Lowery considers a case in which the adjudicator appeared to have ignored a witness statement
-
CommentWrong but not responsible
A recent case serves as a reminder that just because a party is at fault does not necessarily make it responsible for a loss
-
CommentFuel for thought: decommissioning oil and gas projects
We are starting to see the first standard contracts for decommissioning oil and gas projects
-
CommentFacts first or face prison
Although expert witnesses speak for just one side, their first loyalty must be to the truth 鈥� otherwise they risk prosecution
-
CommentHackitt consultation: Taking a hard line on risk
The insurance market for contractors is increasingly tough, and not just on cladding-related work
-
CommentCost versus market: how are price variations measured in construction contracts?
A recent case highlights the two contrasting ways of pricing variations
-
CommentSmash and grab adjudications: what about insolvency?
A recent case may herald a move away from upholding 鈥榮mash and grab鈥� adjudications where insolvency is a factor
-
CommentAdjudication, the low-cost way
Today sees the launch of a pilot scheme for a new聽low-value disputes adjudication service