Legal views – Page 108

  • Ann Minogue
    Comment

    You know it makes sense

    2005-05-27T00:00:00Z

    The British Property Federation has produced one short, simple and fair consultancy agreement for every profession. What do you think its reception will be?

  • Comment

    Too much to ask for?

    2005-05-27T00:00:00Z

    Be warned: there’s an extremely architect-friendly clause hidden in RIBA SFA/99. So friendly, and so hidden, that it has been ruled ‘unusual and onerous’

  • Rudi Klein
    Comment

    Push!

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    The Construction Act needs more radical reforms than are being considered in the present consultation document. Here’s what we should be lobbying for

  • Comment

    CDM: An audit

    2005-05-06T00:00:00Z

    The Health and Safety Executive has just recommended changes to the CDM regulations. So the first question we should ask is: will they do any good?

  • Comment

    Welcome to castle Bolkestein

    2005-05-06T00:00:00Z

    The proposed European Union services directive, or Bolkestein’s monster, as it’s known, could produce a playing field with so many bumps that standards suffer

  • Comment

    An old battleground

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    The hardy perennial of liquidated damages popped up again in a recent court action, which turned on whether the clause was a penalty, and unenforceable, or not

  • Comment

    How do you work this thing?

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    In theory, the Information and Consultation Regulations mean firms face fines of up to £75k if they fail to consult staff – but what will it mean in practice?

  • Rudi Klein
    Comment

    Show me the money

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    We kick off this Construction Act review special by asking why the DTI’s consultation document does not properly address subcontractors’ right to get hold of their cash

  • Comment

    Away with the fairies

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    The DTI thinks that, with a sprinkling of fairy dust, adjudicators can rewrite laws and be made impartial. Believe that, and you might as well believe in Tinkerbell

  • Comment

    What the review missed

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    Concerns about the statutory payment and adjudication provisions in the Construction Act are well founded, but the review fails to deal with all of them head on

  • John Redmond
    Comment

    When less isn’t more

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    When it comes to reforming the Construction Act, the instinct to resist meddling is correct in many cases, but has done nothing to address a major failing

  • Comment

    A victory of sorts

    2005-03-04T00:00:00Z

    Insurance companies may have failed in an attempt to stop payouts to workers with a lung condition caused by asbestos, but they did manage to limit compensation

  • Ann Minogue
    Comment

    Mind and will

    2005-02-25T00:00:00Z

    In a landmark case, a council architect is on trial for manslaughter, after an outbreak of legionnaire’s disease killed seven people. The verdict will be pivotal …

  • Comment

    Biting back

    2005-02-25T00:00:00Z

    The Latham review into payment provisions under the Construction Act recommends removing the need for a payer’s notice. In fact, what it really needs is more teeth

  • Ian Yule
    Comment

    No more party games

    2005-02-25T00:00:00Z

    The interface agreement is a neat device that PFI special purpose vehicles can use to avoid ‘pass the parcel’ between subcontractors. However, the rules are getting complicated

  • Comment

    Czech list

    2004-08-06T00:00:00Z

    The Czech Republic has updated its laws on public procurement to bring them into line with European rules – but there are one or two things you ought to know

  • Comment

    Don't panic

    2004-07-23T00:00:00Z

    Just a thought while I was having my cup of tea: the answer to the debate over whether steel or concrete should be used for the protective barriers around the Houses of Parliament (16 July, page 15) is obvious. Sandbags – hundreds of them should suffice. After all, what was ...

  • Comment

    Czech the small print

    2002-08-02T00:00:00Z

    Communists have always been jumpy about private property – which goes a long way to explaining why developers must still take care in the Czech Republic