After the May Gurney saga, what now for Costain? 好色先生TV looks at the company鈥檚 options

What a difference a month makes. Towards the end of March, the non executive chairman of Costain, David Allvey, recorded a rather upbeat video interview alongside his counterpart at May Gurney, Margaret Ford, hailing a proposed 拢178m all-share merger between the two firms.

Fast forward to last Thursday and a slightly more strained-looking Allvey appeared on camera again - this time alongside Costain chief executive Andrew Wyllie - to explain why the much-touted deal had fallen through thanks to a successful 拢221m bid for May Gurney by Costain鈥檚 larger rival Kier.

[Costain] will continue to develop the business both organically and by acquisitions

Andrew Wyllie, Costain

The older film has been taken down from Costain鈥檚 website while the new one -prominently displayed on the homepage - makes for uncomfortable viewing. In it, Wyllie and Allvey take part in a wooden and seemingly stage-managed question and answer session, batting away imagined criticisms of their bid for May Gurney and grasping at positives including Wyllie鈥檚 claim that Costain has learned from the episode, taking 鈥渁 great deal out of the last few months鈥.

Costain has not been giving further interviews and it鈥檚 not difficult to see why the company鈥檚 leadership - and Wyllie in particular - will feel under pressure given that the failure to land May Gurney follows 2011鈥檚 unsuccessful bid for another huge support services firm trading on the stock market - Mouchel. Missing out once is a misfortune, twice looks like carelessness, so the saying goes.

So what鈥檚 next for Costain? Is the civil engineering specialist鈥檚 overall strategy - to diversify into support services and consulting - still the right one and, if so, how can this now be achieved given its conspicuous failure to buy companies big enough to achieve this in one fell swoop? Moreover, where do the last few weeks leave Wyllie? Could investors see the episode as a sign that fresh blood is required at the top?

The need to expand

At present, Costain believes its 拢900m-turnover business - which specialises in solving tricky infrastructure problems for national clients such as Network Rail, the Highways Agency and Thames Water - isn鈥檛 sufficiently large and is too weighted towards contracting. Around two-thirds of the business is currently devoted to this market, with the remainder split between pre-construction consulting and post-construction support services.

Wyllie said at the time of the May Gurney bid that it was in response to the evolving needs of customers such as the utilities, adding: 鈥淲e need to position ourselves as in the premier league of tier one suppliers to our customers, and to do that we have to have scale, financial strength and diversity of service offering.鈥

In last week鈥檚 video interview he said future acquisitions are still planned, saying Costain would 鈥渃ontinue to develop the business both organically and by acquisitions鈥.
Analysts agree that this is essentially the right approach, especially given the depressed state of the contracting sector. But some speculate that with Costain having twice now tried to bite off more than it can chew, it could now find itself a target for acquisition.

鈥淚 don鈥檛 think [the May Gurney result] means Costain鈥檚 strategy of focusing on infrastructure and the top 40 customers is under threat,鈥 says William Shirley, analyst at Liberum Capital.

鈥淭hat has stood them in very good stead and won鈥檛 change. But they鈥檝e had two potentially transformational bids fall through and, to me, that could make them more vulnerable to a takeover.鈥

To bolster its position, analysts believe Costain should draw up a less ambitious acquisition plan, and fast.

鈥淧articularly in the quoted market, they鈥檝e got to set their sights lower in terms of cost so they鈥檙e not in the same position of disadvantage against other bidders that might come in,鈥 says Kevin Cammack, analyst at Cenkos Securities.

鈥淭hey need to be looking at firms which are far more digestible and where they can allow themselves some wriggle room to change their terms. But I don鈥檛 think there is a specific Plan B.鈥

One scenario might involve Costain buying up a series of smaller, privately-owned firms over time, thereby carrying out its strategy in a less risky but slower way. Last summer, Wyllie said the firm was looking to acquire specialist engineering practices. This followed its purchase of ClerkMaxwell, an engineer specialising in the energy sector in April 2011.

There is also some evidence that it could do something similar in the support services sector given that it also bought Promanex, an industrial support services business with a turnover of 拢55m, in August of the same year.

They鈥檝e got to set their sights lower in terms of cost so they鈥檙e not in the same position of disadvantage against other bidders that might come in

Kevin Cammack, Cenkos Securities

A bolder approach of course would be to make another bid for larger support services firms such as Morrison Utility Services or even the restructured Mouchel - now 95% owned by the banks. But that, of course, invites the possibility of a third high-profile acquisition miss. Kier鈥檚 successful 315p offer for May Gurney included 拢35m in cash and many believe Costain will need to start raising cash in order to sweeten future acquisition bids sufficiently.

Stephen Rawlinson, analyst at Whitman Howard, says the firm is 鈥渂etween a rock and a hard place in terms of paying for an acquisition.鈥

鈥淐ostain鈥檚 shareholders may not necessarily be in a position to follow the money and if the firm tried to raise the cash to buy a privately-owned business, it could find it very difficult,鈥 he says.

鈥淭he firm鈥檚 strategy still should be implemented, it鈥檚 what their customers say they want, but Costain will need to do it slowly, piece by piece. There are bags of companies that the firm should be looking at. It鈥檚 just that it is going to take time to raise the cash.鈥

Confidence in the leadership

While there is clearly a degree of urgency, Costain does perhaps have some time to do this and could also use such a period to focus on its existing business - serving its top clients to the best of its abilities and forming joint ventures when required to bid for larger-scale contracts.

But will Costain鈥檚 current leadership be given this luxury? While there is a great amount of respect in the industry for the day-to-day management of the business demonstrated by Wyllie - a former managing director of Taylor Woodrow Construction who joined Costain in 2005 - observers are less complimentary about his deal-making record, with some expressing bemusement about the bid for May Gurney given the likelihood of a Kier counter-offer.

In addition to the valuable management time, Costain will have spent a significant sum on professional advice, with Whitman Howard鈥檚 Rawlinson estimating that Costain is likely to have spent about 拢5m on it.

鈥淭hat [would be] around 25% of one year鈥檚 profit and yet it is unlikely that they could have succeeded in buying the company,鈥 he argues.

鈥淓veryone who knows about the industry knew that Kier wanted to buy either Enterprise or May Gurney.鈥

Rawlinson applauds Costain鈥檚 鈥渄iscipline鈥 in offering to pay only what it thought was right for its own shareholders but also believes its offer of 拢253.2p per share was pitched too low to make it difficult to beat.

Others also question the logic of chasing May Gurney given how far removed its services - including providing bin collection and street sweeping services to councils - are from Costain鈥檚 more technical core offer.

Whether the current leadership is given a third opportunity to transform Costain may depend on the attitude of two of the firm鈥檚 major investors - Malaysian infrastructure group UEM Builders and Kuwaiti firm the Kharafi Group - which between them hold more than 40% of its shares.

Cammack, for one, believes that Wyllie has done just enough to retain confidence in his position.

鈥淚鈥檇 rather get one or two things wrong in my acquisition strategy than get things wrong in terms of the business I鈥檓 actually running,鈥 he points out.

鈥淏ut he certainly can鈥檛 make another mistake like this.鈥

WHAT NOW FOR ANDREW WYLLIE?

William Shirley, analyst at Liberum Capital

鈥淭he failed deals are unhelpful but clearly preferable to overpaying. His strategy since he took over has been the right one and I personally don鈥檛 think his position is under threat.鈥

Tony Williams, analyst at 好色先生TV Value

鈥淚 think Wyllie has done a pretty fair job and I think the bid for May Gurney was a really good idea. What he shouldn鈥檛 do in my view is go after another listed firm and risk failure. He鈥檚 been unlucky but please don鈥檛 be unlucky a third time.鈥

Kevin Cammack, analyst at Cenkos Securities

鈥淚 do feel for him - he does not deserve a 鈥榡ilted at the altar鈥 tag and you can see clearly the basis of his intended strategy. If anything, Costain has been a bit naive and needs to be more savvy in identifying targets where it has a far better chance of success.鈥

How times change

Andrew Wyllie

David Allvey and Andrew Wyllie in a video that appeared on Costain鈥檚 website last week

Costain chairman David Allvey, 26 March 2013:

鈥淭he Costain strategy has been extremely clear: to become a leader in the design, delivery and maintenance of national infrastructure. The announcement today is a highly significant step in that process. Together with May Gurney, we will have the added experience and skills to underline our leadership status and to provide a platform for new growth and success.鈥

Costain chairman David Allvey, 25 April 2013:

鈥淲e announced in March a recommended offer for May Gurney which we believed fully reflected the value of May Gurney following several months of due diligence. Indeed that offer received the unanimous recommendation of the May Gurney board.

鈥淓arlier this week the Kier Group announced an offer at some 35% higher. We believe the offer we made fully reflected the value of the business and we have concluded we will not increase that offer.鈥