好色先生TV

When the education department revealed two weeks ago that the first 24 free schools would open their doors to pupils this September, Rachel Wolf felt a certain sense of vindication. 鈥淎 year ago, when I was saying that I thought there could be free schools opening in 2011, and hundreds over the course of the parliament, I was met with polite disbelief at best,鈥� she says.

Now look 鈥�

As director of the New Schools Network, the charity charged by the government with delivering its free schools programme, and, before that, a policy adviser to education secretary Michael Gove, Wolf has been perhaps more closely involved than anyone with the evolution of the Conservatives鈥� drive for free schools - so her moment of triumph was well earned. But for her early optimism to be truly vindicated, there is still some way to go. Progress with setting up free schools has been slowed by a shortage of sites, and doubts have been raised over how quickly the initiative will gather momentum, even with the political will of the government behind it.

On top of that, the free schools policy remains hugely controversial, to put it mildly. The mission to allow parents, teachers and other interested groups to bypass their local education services and set up schools themselves, an idea that began to gather momentum in the UK in 2009, has resulted in two years of battles in parliament. And the comment pages of the national press have groaned with debate as critics question the merits of allowing groups - such as the Maharishi school, which teaches the philosophy of the Beatles鈥� former guru - to use public money to set up their own institutions and curriculums. Meanwhile, defenders of the policy continue to argue that it offers a valuable chance to give parents greater choice over education, at the same time as addressing the dire shortage of school places in England.

So, just who is the young woman at the centre of the government鈥檚 flagship education initiative? And what chance does she have of driving through a pipeline of schools that - with 好色先生TV Schools for the Future scrapped and public money tight - could provide a vital lifeline to construction firms working in the education sector?

Early days

Wolf herself, like the free schools policy she is delivering, has been dogged by controversy. Just 26 years old, she has been involved in the education sector pretty much since leaving Cambridge university, where she studied natural sciences.

After graduating, she worked on a research project at the Institute of Education before securing a job with Boris Johnson, working on his higher education policy. At that time, David Willetts, the then shadow education secretary, was developing the free schools initiative for the first time, and Wolf did some work with him. 鈥淭hat was when I really started getting interested in education,鈥� she says. After a spell working on Johnson鈥檚 London mayoral campaign, she left to work for Michael Gove.

It was during this time, after studying the education system in the US, that she decided to set up the New Schools Network. 鈥淚 came across organisations that help get charter schools [similar to free schools] up and running, and I felt that if free schools were really going to happen, fast and at scale, something similar had to happen here.鈥�

That was in June 2009. Since then, of course, the Conservatives have entered government, making free schools a national policy. And the New Schools Network (NSN) has been charged with handling expressions of interest from groups wanting to establish schools, guiding them through the bureaucratic process to the point where they are in a position to have a school approved by the government. The NSN also liaises closely with government delivery agency Partnerships for Schools, which directly runs the construction procurement on free schools.

The NSN was given 拢500,000 of government money to propel the free schools initiative forward a year ago, when Wolf was just 25. Since then detractors have questioned both her experience and the closeness of her ties with Gove鈥檚 department: as well as her former role as an adviser to the education secretary, her mother, academic Alison Wolf, was recently appointed to carry out a review for the government into vocational education.

Articulate and confident when we meet in her Canary Wharf office, Wolf is relaxed about comments about her age. 鈥淚 get scepticism, yes, but not to my face.鈥� On the subject of the 拢500,000 grant, Wolf says: 鈥淭o get the programme up and running quickly, you need an organisation able to deliver the kind of advice that we gave. I am very confident if we hadn鈥檛 been around for the past year there wouldn鈥檛 have been many free schools opening this year or indeed next.鈥�

Delays and hurdles

Despite being 鈥渄elighted鈥� that the first 24 schools will open this September, Wolf acknowledges that the pace of the initiative could be faster - she says the NSN helped 鈥渟everal hundred鈥� groups over the past year, while the Department for Education received 600 applications.

Finding suitable sites, she says, has been 鈥減robably the biggest difficulty these groups have鈥�. Of the first 24 schools, about 15 will begin life in temporary accommodation - and although this is partly due to the speed of establishing the schools, it is also indicative of the problem of finding suitable sites, particularly for conversion.

鈥淭he planning regime has not been helpful, a lot of available sites have been sold off in previous years and converted to residential or commercial space,鈥� she says. The government recently announced some planning changes designed to speed up the conversions of sites for educational use, which Wolf believes 鈥渨ill help, but I don鈥檛 think as much as they were originally planning鈥�. She leans forward with characteristic intensity. 鈥淚 think they should be going further and stronger.鈥�

Wolf believes the key to finding more sites and setting them up faster is changing the approach to the buildings. 鈥淚n the same way that schools are encouraged to be innovative in education, they should be encouraged to be innovative around the buildings and sites they鈥檙e in,鈥� she says. 鈥淚n the long term, there should be significant changes in the way free schools are funded for buildings.鈥�

Part of the problem, she says, is that with schools being given a set amount of capital funding, most look to acquire sites outright, and leasing is only considered as an option when delivery body Partnerships for Schools advises that would be the best use of the capital. 鈥淭he basic approach to property needs to change,鈥� says Wolf. 鈥淭here needs to be more of a flexible lease-based model.鈥�

She suggests that if schools were allowed to switch funding between capital and revenue pots, and were given funding per pupil for capital to account for changing pupil numbers, they would have a more flexible budget that would make it more viable for them to lease buildings.

Growing interest

In any case, Wolf believes there is much cause for optimism over the number of projects for next year. 鈥淲e still don鈥檛 know how many schools the government will approve for opening next year, but from the strength of the applications we鈥檝e seen, it definitely shouldn鈥檛 be fewer than 80. It could be 100.鈥� She says that the NSN has seen 鈥渘o diminution鈥� in the numbers of expressions of interest it is receiving, and, interestingly, adds that she has seen 鈥渓ocal authorities becoming more encouraging鈥� to free schools as they struggle to find ways to meet their obligations to provide school places.

The vast majority of construction work will be conversion or refurbishment of existing buildings rather than new build: the permanent sites for the 24 schools approved include a converted hospital, a library, a school and government buildings. However, the range of costs involved is surprisingly wide - Wolf says that projects can range from below 拢1m to 拢10m-拢20m. 鈥淚t鈥檚 partly because the free schools differ from each other enormously, in size and location.鈥� Overall, the government has set aside between 拢110m and 拢130m of capital funding for work on these 24 projects.

Work is currently procured through delivery body Partnerships for Schools, which uses its academies contractors鈥� framework for large amounts of the work. But Wolf says the NSN is keen for construction firms to have more early contact with her organisation and with free school groups. Such a move would, she says, improve these groups鈥� understanding of construction issues but it would also give construction firms a greater understanding of free schools, giving them an advantage in any future bids. 鈥淲e want to make sure groups are more prepared for the procurement and site issues they may face, and want to give them more exposure to the industry,鈥� she says. 鈥淲e鈥檙e going to be talking to firms over the next couple of months about that.鈥�

In addition, Wolf believes the industry has a large role to play in defining the standards of buildings used for free schools. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think there has been enough debate yet about what space requirements might be,鈥� she says. 鈥淲e need to move beyond just looking at 好色先生TV Bulletin standards plus or minus a certain percentage.鈥�

Wolf believes that the biggest difference that can be made to pupils is through teaching rather than school environments: 鈥淚 think too much of the emphasis on BSF was on the idea that a building could transform standards,鈥� she says. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think the school environment is the most important thing, honestly, and I know that will be unpopular.鈥�

鈥淭hat said,鈥� she adds hastily, 鈥渙bviously being in a safe, quiet environment which promotes learning is helpful.鈥�

She pauses, clearly keen to avoid alienating a construction audience. 鈥淎nd, look, I think great architecture is great, it鈥檚 wonderful. I love architecture and I think a lot of these buildings are fantastic. I just think that in a time of constrained resources, if you鈥檙e choosing between things, the quality of teaching has to come first.鈥�

Her time in politics has served her well.