好色先生TV

How to civilise that most yobbishly inarticulate of town centre buildings, the multistorey car park? Ideally, bring in a celeb architect, like double-Stirling prize winner Wilkinson Eyre Architects. But as that firm is presently working on many exciting projects, from the twin towers of Guangzhou in south-east China to a double-barrelled arena in Liverpool, would it look twice at a car park?

The surprising answer is yes, of course. Alongside its constant throughput of iconic buildings, Wilkinson Eyre has tackled no fewer than four multistorey car parks in England, from Exeter and Bristol to Liverpool. The latest to be completed is part of developer Grosvenor鈥檚 high-profile Paradise Street retail development in Liverpool city centre, not far from that arena. This, and the adjoining bus station, which is also designed by Wilkinson Eyre, are the first elements of a 拢900m development. They originally stood nearby, but have been relocated to make way for the retail moneyspinners planned by Grosvenor.

The 拢9.6m, 22,675m2 building displays Wilkinson Eyre鈥檚 award-winning combination of functionalism and flair. It conforms to the building type by being a basic six-storey box, but out of it bursts a sculptural series of swooping, curving, sloping ramps faced in silvery stainless steel. In the words of Keith Brownlie, Wilkinson Eyre鈥檚 director, the ramps amount to 鈥渁 rococo moment in a modernist piece鈥�.

The brief drawn up for the car park by Grosvenor and its innovative European operator Q-Park, Passenger Transport Executive was for car parking spaces above a taxi rank and a bus parking area to serve the bus station. The straightforward and spatially efficient solution would have been to fill the entire polygonal site with a car park. Instead, the architect opted for the conventional rectangular plan with 579 parking spaces arranged along either side of a race-track circuit.

We are celebrating the one thing a car park has 鈥� the animation of cars driving up from floor to floor and back down again

Keith Brownlie, Wilkinson Eyre

This solution raises the building by one storey but gives it a purer rectilinear profile. The leftover space at the ground level is used as the turning circle for buses.

So far, the building was shaping up to be just another depressingly lifeless multistorey car park, fronted by repetitive horizontal banding or masquerading as an office building with its eyes poked out. The big difference in Wilkinson Eyre鈥檚 approach was how it treated the vertical circulation system of ramps.

鈥淲e are celebrating the one thing a car park has 鈥� the animation of cars driving up from floor to floor and back down again,鈥� says Brownlie. Rather than losing themselves in the building, the ramps pop out and in both sides of the structure on every floor. Their sloping curvaceous shapes, faced in stainless steel and highlighted with fluorescent strip lights in the ceiling, are a sculptural foil to the flat facades behind.

The ramps are fully exposed only on the east side of the building, where they contrast with the louvred screen wall behind and are jazzed up further by being stepped up and sideways on each floor.

The ramps鈥� curvaceous shapes, faced in stainless steel and highlighted with fluorescent strip lights, are a sculptural foil to the flat facades behind

On the west side is a regional police headquarters which, worried about criminal espionage, demanded a privacy screen beyond the ramps. Even so, the west side reveals a special double-sized ramp, which combines up and down carriageways and rises to the double-storey height of the first floor to clear the double-decker buses below. Twice as wide and twice as high as the other ramps, this bulges out further in a vivid vermillion that contrasts with the neutral, translucent polycarbonate panels of the privacy screen above.

Two other elements will be neatly plugged into the finished building. One is the control and ticket office, which is a rectangular zinc-clad pod suspended in the 7m gap between the main building and the freestanding privacy screen. The outer end of the pod is fully glazed and frames a refreshing view of the Chevasse Park 鈥� the main green space of the whole Paradise Street development.

The other plug-in will be a 拢2m footbridge spanning 60m to a John Lewis store, presently under construction. What rankled the architect was that the footbridge had to be set at a slight angle to the rectilinear geometry of the main building, but it partly compensated for this by kinking the bridge so that its central section is aligned to the axis of the main building.

The final element of the scheme is the boundary wall. This had to follow the curved outline of the site, and the architect opted for brick in sympathy with the elaborate red-brick buildings of the conservation area it faces. But here again the obvious solution of a curved brick wall would have conflicted with the building鈥檚 geometry. So Wilkinson Eyre came up with a sequence of rectangular panels. They hug the boundary line at ground level, but each is articulated by a slight diagonal fold that sets up a rhythm of wedge-shaped grooves at the top.

At Paradise Street, Wilkinson Eyre has given clarity, legibility and usability to a habitually brutish and disorientating building type. With its openly expressed ramps it has animated a previously lifeless form. It is an object lesson step in taming the car in high-density inner-city regeneration.