好色先生TV

For a digital edition version of this update, click here

The construction sector鈥檚 reaction to the referendum on Brexit was initially muted. After the dust settled, the industry rallied strongly, shaking off uncertainty and going on to record strong output levels over 2017 and 2018. The current situation appears to be changing, with a negative market response to Brexit and a downward business cycle emerging. 

The economics of the construction sector will be influenced by most Brexit outcomes. Sourcing strategies for labour, materials and components are likely to require adjustment, as many projects currently being tendered, or coming up for tender, will have construction programmes extending beyond April 2019. 

Construction sentiment has generally held up, despite the mixed economic backdrop. Tier-two contractors are still mostly confident on workload further out into 2019; however, they are talking about more uncertainty ahead, which main contractors have seen for longer. 

Operational challenges remain, ranging from wage inflation, skills retention and project delivery, while maintaining staff levels to deliver current workload. 

A tight labour market remains an issue for many construction sector firms. Labour input costs are still rising year-on-year, with expectations of further increases into 2019, and concerns around labour and staff resources remain a key issue for many firms. Construction industry regular pay rates continued to rise above earnings for the UK economy in Q3 2018. The 鈥渨hole economy鈥� measure recorded around a 3% year-on-year change through 2018, but construction regular pay has averaged nearer 5% over the same period.

Construction materials costs increased by approximately 5% over the year to the third quarter of 2018. A broader measure of input costs for manufacturing industries, published by the Office for National Statistics, saw input costs increase by 10.3% on a yearly basis up to September 2018. This reflects a pick-up in the rate of change on a monthly and yearly basis. Crude oil was the largest single contributor to the 12-month change, up by 38% over the period, although this is a slower rate than the 41% posted in August. 

Extended lead times indicate on-going pressure on resources and that overall workload is using all available market capacity. Further indicators of supply chain tightness 鈥� insolvencies data, for example 鈥� also signal the on-going difficulties to secure resources. Procurement across the supply chain will continue to be influenced by a mixture of capacity, risk apportionment and selectivity. Supply chain prices are expected to continue a positive year-on-year path as constrained capacity and market dynamics dictate the price to secure staff and labour. However, the rate of price inflation will be lower, which is reflective of a slowing level of activity.  

Price inflation trends have slowed and levelled out after a number of years at above-average rates of change. Selling prices are unable to keep pace with the rate of input cost inflation though, keeping commercial pressures elevated. Although there has been some pass-through into output prices, there will remain an inability to recover all of the input cost pressures, particularly as competition increases on a weaker overall outlook on future work. Clearly, this assumes a continuation of current input cost trends. 

Figure 2: Tender price inflation, Aecom Tender Price Index, 2015 = 100

					Forecast
Quarter	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021
1	96.3	104.6	111.2	114.1	116.8	119.5	123.2
2	99.0	106.6	112.2	115.1	117.3	120.3	123.9
3	101.4	108.8	112.9	115.9	118.3	121.2	124.9
4	103.4	110.2	113.9	116.4	118.8	122.0	126.4

Future activity is expected to be modest in comparison with recent years. Elevated input costs from tight supply-side constraints and the likelihood that sterling remains lower for longer will be key factors that support tender price inflation over the short term. Aecom鈥檚 baseline forecasts for tender price inflation then are 1.0% from Q3 2018 to Q3 2019, and 1.2% from Q3 2019 to Q3 2020. 

The rate of tender price inflation over the year ahead will be influenced by: the level of risk accepted by the supply chain and how that is priced; whether discounting to current tender rates is palatable or achievable in order to secure work; further consolidation and capacity limitations of the supply chain; adverse movements in the sterling exchange rate; and damage to confidence from global economic shocks such as tariffs and political volatility. Upside risks to tender prices still exist though, from a combination of supply-side (resource constraints) and demand-side issues (sector dynamics).

Figure 3: Indicative cost ranges based on gross internal floor area

Type	Base index 100 (拢/m2)	Notes
Frames
Steel frame to low-rise building	98-119	Steelwork design based on 55kg/m2
Steel frame to high-rise building	166-188	Steelwork design based on 90kg/m2
Complex steel frame	188-222	Steelwork design based on 110kg/m2
Floors
Composite floors, metal decking and lightweight concrete topping	61-92	Two-way spanning deck, typical 3m span, with concrete topping up to 150mm
Precast concrete composite floor with concrete topping	98-139	Hollowcore precast concrete planks with structural concrete topping spanning between primary steel beams
Fire protection
Fire protection to steel columns and beams (60 minutes鈥� resistance)	14-20	Factory-applied intumescent coating
Fire protection to steel columns and beams (90 minutes鈥� resistance)	16-29	Factory-applied intumescent coating
Portal frames
Large-span single-storey building with low eaves (6-8m)	74-96	Steelwork design based on 35kg/m2
Large-span single-storey building with high eaves (10-13m)	84-115	Steelwork design based on 45kg/m2

Figure 4: BCIS location factors, as at Q4 2018 (*Aecom Index)

Location	BCIS Index	Location	BCIS Index
Central London	125	Nottingham	106
Manchester	101	Glasgow	91
Birmingham	97	Newcastle	96
Liverpool	96	Cardiff	84
Leeds	89	Dublin	94*

Cost comparison updates 

This quarter鈥檚 Costing Steelwork provides an update of the five previously featured cost comparisons covering: offices, education, industrial, retail and mixed-use

These five projects were originally part of the Target Zero study conducted by a consortium of organisations including Tata Steel, Aecom, SCI, Cyril Sweett and the BCSA in 2010 to provide guidance on the design and construction of sustainable, low- and zero-carbon buildings in the UK. The cost models for these five projects have been reviewed and updated as part of the Costing Steelwork series. The latest cost models as of Q4 2018 are presented here. 

Costing steelwork: offices update 

Below is an update to the offices cost comparison originally published in the Costing Steelwork Offices feature in 好色先生TV magazine in April 2017.

One Kingdom Street, London, key features

• 10 storeys, with two levels of basement
• Typical clear spans of 12m x 10.5m 
• Three cores 鈥� one main core with open atrium, scenic atrium bridges and lifts
• Plant at roof level

Cost comparison 

Two structural options for the office building were assessed (as shown in figure 5): 

• Base case 鈥� a steel frame, comprising fabricated cellular steel beams supporting a lightweight concrete slab on a profiled steel deck
• Option 1 鈥� 350mm-thick post-tensioned concrete flat slab with a 650mm x 1,050mm perimeter beam.

The full building cost plans for each structural option have been reviewed and updated to provide current costs at Q4 2018. There has been no real cost movement from Q3 to Q4. The costs, which include preliminaries, overheads, profit and a contingency, are summarised in figure 5. 

The cost of the steel composite solution is 7% lower than that for the post-tensioned concrete flat slab alternative for the frame and upper floors, and 5% lower on a total-building basis.

Figure 5: Key costs 拢/m² (GIFA), for City of London office building

Elements	Steel composite	Post-tensioned concrete flat slab
Substructure	87	92
Frame and upper floors	430	464
Total building	2,587	2,726

Costing steelwork: industrial update

Below is an update to the industrial cost comparison originally published in the Costing Steelwork Industrial feature in 好色先生TV magazine in October 2017.

Distribution warehouse in ProLogis Park, Stoke-on-Trent, key features

• Warehouse: four-span, steel portal frame, with a net internal floor area of 34,000m²
• Office: 1,400m², two-storey office wing with a braced steel frame with columns

Cost comparison 

Three frame options were considered:

• Base option 鈥� a steel portal frame with a simple roof solution
• Option 1 鈥� a hybrid option: precast concrete column and glulam beams with timber rafters
• Option 2 鈥� a steel portal frame with a northlight roof solution.

The full building cost plans for each option have been updated to provide costs at Q4 2018. The steel portal frame provides optimum build value at 拢674/m²; glulam is least cost-efficient. This is primarily due to the cost premium for the structural members necessary to provide the required spans, which are otherwise efficiently catered for in the steelwork solution. With a hybrid, the elements are from different suppliers, which raises the cost. The northlights option is directly comparable with the portal frame in relation to the warehouse and office frame. The variance is in the roof framing as the northlights need more. Other additional costs relate to the glazing of the northlights.

Figure 7: Key costs 拢/m² (GIFA), for Stoke-on-Trent distribution warehouse

Elements	Steel portal frame	Glulam beams + purlins + concrete columns	Steel portal frame + north-lights
Warehouse	70	139	81
Office	126	168	126
Total frame	72	140	84
Total building	674	754	723

Costing steelwork: mixed-use update

Below is an update to the mixed-use cost comparison originally published in the Costing Steelwork mixed-use focus feature in 好色先生TV magazine in April 2018.

Holiday Inn tower, MediaCityUK, Manchester

• 17-storey tower 
• 7,153m² of open-plan office space on five floors (floors two to six)
• 9,265m² of hotel space on eight floors (floors eight to 15)

The gross internal floor area of the building is 18,625m². The 67m-high building is rectilinear with approximate dimensions of 74m x 15.3m.

Cost comparison 

Three frame options were considered to establish the optimum solution for the building:

• Base option 鈥� steel frame with Slimdek floors
• Option 1 鈥� concrete flat slab
• Option 2 鈥� composite deck on cellular beams (offices) and UCs used as beams (hotel).

The full building cost plans for each option have been updated to provide costs at Q4 2018. The steel frame with composite deck continues to provide the optimum build value with the overall building cost at 拢2,533/m².

Options 1 and 2 are arguably more typical for this building type. The base case structure is an unusual solution due to a decision to change the residential accommodation to office floors at a very late stage; time constraints precluded redesign of the tower block and hence the original Slimdek design was constructed.

Figure 9: Key costs 拢/m² (GIFA), for hotel/office building in Manchester

Elements	Slimdek	Concrete flat slab	Composite deck on cellular beams (offices) and UCs used as beams (hotel)
Structural unit cost	504	421	345
Total building unit cost	2,737	2,636	2,533