好色先生TV

Known locally as the 鈥渟uper school鈥�, the recently completed Barony Campus boasts an impressive list of facilities that would make most head teachers green with envy. Sports facilities include two full-sized, floodlit rugby pitches built to world-class standards, a 400m running track and 13 indoor courts. Other niceties include a 550-seat auditorium for concerts, complete with a recording studio and an immersive cinema. It also has a hydrotherapy pool that would not look out of place at a top hotel, a cafe and of course all the features commensurate with a state-of-the-art school.

The Barony Campus brings five schools together under one roof at Cumnock in East Ayrshire, Scotland. In many respects the 2,500-pupil facility harks back to the golden days of the 好色先生TV Schools for the Future (BSF) programme; architecturally and in terms of facilities the school has more in common with BSF than with the more recent Priority Schools 好色先生TV Programme and its Scottish equivalent, the Schools for the Future programme and more recently the Learning Estate Investment Programme.

The buildings are constructed from a discreet, tasteful palette of buff and dark bricks, with raw umber-coloured steel cladding and generous areas of glazing. Internally the restrained colour palette continues in soft greens, blues and greys, with timber cladding and exposed services that make the interiors feel more spacious. Impressively, this school was brought in for the same cost as those procured through the Scottish schools funding programmes.

The 拢67m project, which is the biggest in East Ayrshire council鈥檚 history, is in a deprived former mining area, so the council saw this as an opportunity to improve the prospects for locals.

鈥淲e wanted a very high-quality design and saw this as a fundamental part of what we were doing because the learning environment we give our children is absolutely fundamentally linked to their levels of attainment,鈥� explains Alistair Kidd, East Ayrshire鈥檚 senior project and resource manager. 鈥淭he communities of Cumnock and Auchinleck are areas of high deprivation and unemployment, so we saw this project as a critical catalyst for change to give young people hope and to make them feel valued.鈥�

Kidd says there was a mismatch between East Ayrshire鈥檚 aspirations and the low fees paid to consultants through the Scottish funding programmes, which are administered through a series of frameworks. He says: 鈥淚n our view these procurement routes undervalue the architectural part of the project and seek to keep consultants鈥� fees to a minimum, which stymies creativity and innovation in design. We didn鈥檛 think it was appropriate to do that when taking all the factors into consideration.鈥�

We wanted a high-quality design and saw this as a fundamental part of what we were doing. The learning environment we give our children is fundamentally linked  to their levels of attainment

Alistair Kidd, senior project and resource manager, East Ayrshire council

Funds for the Scottish Schools for the Future programme and its successor, the Learning Estate Investment Programme, are administered through a government body called the Scottish Futures Trust. Councils can procure a school through a series of regional hubs that use frameworks for design and construction.

These fit well with councils that want straightforward schools delivered efficiently with the minimum of fuss. But this model did not match East Ayrshire council鈥檚 need for a design that responded specifically to its ambitions. 鈥淲e felt there was value in paying a proper fee to an architectural firm because we felt there were real benefits to such an approach,鈥� says Kidd.

To some, East Ayrshire鈥檚 aspirations for its new school might sound like a recipe for ballooning costs. But the council found a neat way to get better value for money than that offered by the frameworks. According to Kidd, councils pay a management fee to the framework providers in addition to the fees charged by consultants. East Ayrshire decided to bypass the frameworks by borrowing the money for the school instead and reinvesting the management fee into the design.

Conscious of its responsibility to get value for money, the council benchmarked itself against the Scottish Futures Trust cost matrix for new schools. It used two metrics: the cost of the school per square metre and the area per pupil.

Freed from the constraints of the frameworks, the council went down the traditional procurement route. It appointed Sheppard Robson as the architect with the idea the firm would work up the design to the planning stage before appointing a main contractor on a lump sum basis. Interestingly, Sheppard Robson had previously applied for a place on the Scottish Future Trust design framework but says it was unsuccessful as it was not prepared to reduce the amount of time spent on design and its fees to win a place.

The council wanted the project to provide cross-community benefits, so engaged in a long and comprehensive consultation process. Shortlisted architects presented to the council and community, with Sheppard Robson impressing across the board.

According to the practice, it spoke to more than 600 people and 127 organisations during the design phase, which took a year and was paid for out of the management fee savings plus the design fee that the council would have had to pay a framework provider.

The school was to be built on Cumnock Academy鈥檚 playing fields, and some locals took exception to a three-storey building in the view across these fields. The council had one particularly high-profile, architecturally sensitive neighbour to contend with. Prince Charles owns nearby Dumfries House and is supporting the construction of a new village called Knockroon, essentially a Poundbury of the north and one field away from the proposed school.

Kidd and Sheppard Robson stress that the prince had no influence over the design. 鈥淔rom the beginning it was made known to us that His Royal Highness would take an interest in this project, and we had that in the back of our minds from the get-go,鈥� explains Adam McGhee, the Sheppard Robson partner responsible for delivery of the project.

鈥淗e kept a very respectful distance; he had no privileges, and he wasn鈥檛 treated any differently from any other neighbour to the site.鈥� McGhee and his colleague Rupert Goddard, the partner responsible for the front end design, presented the scheme to the prince and say this did not elicit a negative response.

With planning secured, the council appointed Morrison Construction to build the school under a design and build contract. Sheppard Robson was novated to Morrison, and McGhee says some adjustments were needed to meet the budget.

The school features generous fenestration to make the most of the views and to maximise  natural light. Morrison suggested reducing the size of the windows to save money. 鈥淲e weren鈥檛 prepared to negotiate on the size and amount of glazing because that is a key characteristic of the elevations,鈥� says McGhee. The council and architect did compromise elsewhere, however; for example, the number of rooflights was reduced while still meeting required lighting levels, and the green roofs were dropped as these were not essential. Another non-negotiable area was the exposed services 鈥� the contractor preferred conventional ceilings as these are easier to build but the council would not compromise.

McGhee says it helped that the design was so far advanced when the contractor was appointed as this made it more difficult to make changes. 鈥淭he planning consent can protect the design because sometimes going back into planning for an amendment is more painful than accepting the cost of the design as it is intended.鈥� 

From the beginning it was made known to us that His royal highness would take an interest in this project, and we had that at the back of our minds from the get-go. he kept a very respectful distance

Adam McGhee, partner, Sheppard Robson

Another benefit of an advanced design was greater predictability of delivery cost, which meant the team could agree a budget that everybody was happy with. McGhee is keen to stress that design and build worked well on this project. 鈥淭he reason why Morrison won the tender was because of their approach and the way they were willing to come to the table and work with the design that had been established. It was a really good, positive relationship with the contractor in this design and build set-up.鈥�

A key win for the council was bringing in the project for the same cost as the Scottish Future Trust benchmarks, which proves that high-quality design need not attract a premium. And the council and the architect are both delighted with the finished product. 鈥淚 think it is outstanding,鈥� says Kidd. 鈥淚 genuinely feel we have delivered one of the best products in terms of listening to what the community want and giving them what they need. Everyone who comes to see it is absolutely blown away by it.鈥�

Kidd adds that at the end of last year the procurement rules were changed so it is no longer mandatory to use a framework to deliver a school as a condition of funding. 鈥淪everal local authorities have got in touch and shown an interest in our project. They are now actively pursuing projects in a similar fashion to the way we did it at Barony Campus.鈥�

This project demonstrates that a well-managed, traditional procurement process can deliver high-quality outcomes for the same cost as today鈥檚 pared-down education construction budgets and is a useful lesson for Westminster and Holyrood.