好色先生TV

Last year a low-key demolition job in the City of London became big news. National newspapers carried striking images of a building being demolished from the bottom up. The top floors were left dramatically hanging in space as the lower ones were removed, leaving only the concrete core. The pictures begged the question: how did the top half stay up?

The answer is that the floorplate edges were supported by hangers from the roof rather than columns from the ground. This is good for creating uncluttered perimeter space inside a building, but the downside is that it is difficult to demolish using conventional methods because the building will collapse if the roof is removed. With demolition specialist McGee busy pulling down the building in question 鈥� at 122 Leadenhall Street 鈥� there are just three top-hung buildings left in London.

Not for much longer. Another demolition specialist, Keltbray, is busy taking down a top-hung building in nearby 20 Fenchurch Street to clear the site for the Rafael Vi帽oly-designed Walkie-Talkie tower. The difference is that Fenchurch Street is 25 storeys high, whereas Leadenhall was only 15. 鈥淚t was a baby thing compared to this,鈥� jokes Jim O鈥橲ullivan, Keltbray鈥檚 contracts manager in charge of the job.

What makes the building so hard to knock down? The main problem is the roof structure, which has to be huge to take the weight of all those suspended floorplates. The roof is triangulated, takes up three floors of space, and is built from heavy post-tensioned concrete beams. 鈥淵ou normally see this sort of post-tensioned structure in bridge design,鈥� says O鈥橲ullivan. 鈥淚t was a major engineering feat at this level.鈥� The lack of perimeter columns also means the building has a more substantial core than usual. These factors mean a similar feat of engineering is needed to get the building down again.

Several demolition options were explored. 鈥淲e considered explosives, but it wasn鈥檛 really possible,鈥� says O鈥橲ullivan. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a confined city-centre site, the building is high with a top-heavy structure and there are a lot of congested services around it.鈥�

What about copying the technique used by McGee? 鈥淚n our opinion it would have made it much more complicated,鈥� says O鈥橲ullivan. He says problems would start once all the floors had been removed, leaving the core and roof structure. 鈥淲e would have ended up with a big concrete mushroom,鈥� he says. This would have needed a substantial scaffolding structure to provide a platform for demolition equipment to break up the roof structure and the core, and provide protection to the local workers and buildings below.

The solution was to insert temporary columns around the building perimeter, in effect turning the upside-down structure into something more conventional, so it could be demolished normally. 鈥淲e decided resupporting the structure bottom up was the safest and most appropriate method,鈥� says O鈥橲ullivan. He adds that McGee is also taking down the top seven storeys of its building this way. McGee took out so many bottom floors not to create publicity for the demolition industry, but to enable demolition and new construction work to take place concurrently. Removing the lower floors created the necessary headroom for piling rigs to start work on the new building.

Another difficulty facing Keltbray at Fenchurch Street was asbestos. While it got the temporary works under way, this had to be removed from the tower, which took 17 months. The building had floors made from steel decking topped with concrete. The asbestos was sprayed all over the original steelwork, including the decking, and was encapsulated under the concrete. Each floor was protected with plastic sheets and placed under negative pressure to stop asbestos escaping, then the concrete slabs were broken out and the asbestos removed, first by scraping with small excavators, then by specialised grit blasting and finally by hand.

Meanwhile, the temporary works were designed in-house by engineering arm Wentworth House, and were being installed. Steel columns were inserted between the floors. Each column needed a plinth cast for it to take up the slack. More than 1,300 columns were installed, adding up to two miles of steel.

When we cut the hangers there was a bang, the hangers dropped by 35mm, the truss dropped by 16mm and the whole building shook

Jim O鈥橲ullivan, keltbray

Before the hangers supporting the floorplates at the top of the building could be cut, a connection between the temporary columns and solid ground was needed. The easiest solution was to transfer the loads from the columns to the structure already supporting the building 鈥� that is, the core.

The device used is a large truss that encircles the building鈥檚 base. This supports the columns and transfers the loads to the core using a large, angled concrete column at each corner of the core. To create the space for the truss the second floor was taken out in a similar fashion to the building in Leadenhall Street. The truss was built up on the first-floor slab from prefabricated elements over eight weeks using forklift trucks, as its location was inaccessible to a tower crane. The concrete columns were cast, then two big A-frames were built and strand jacks used to haul the 250-tonne truss up into its final position under the third-floor slab. The first-floor slab was taken out and the truss connected to the columns, ready for its big moment.

That day was a Saturday, when all the hangers supporting the floors below were cut with oxyacetylene cutters, a job that took just two hours. The moment the last hangers were cut, the loads were transferred from the hangers to the columns at the edge of the building, down into the truss below and into the core. 鈥淲hen we cut the hangers there was a bang, the hangers dropped by 35mm, the truss dropped 16mm and the whole building shook,鈥� says O鈥橲ullivan. 鈥淚t was a combination of the steel hangers contracting, and the roof rising as the loads were released. For 40 years the building has been top hung and now we have turned it up the other way.鈥�

There was one more important job to do before Keltbray could start demolition. It needed to check that the post-tensioned concrete beams used for the roof structure were safe to break up. Post-tensioned elements have steel strands running through ducts in the concrete which are tensioned after the concrete has cured. These ducts are filled with grout to lock everything in place, but if the beams hadn鈥檛 been grouted properly the steel tendons could contract explosively when broken up.

Keltbray used ground penetrating radar to locate the ducts in the beams, then ultrasonic tests to check the integrity of the grout. Just to make doubly sure the beams were safe, one was taken out and carefully broken up in the basement. 鈥淲e wrapped it in big rubber mats and sandbags because if it went bang there was nothing we could do,鈥� says O鈥橲ullivan. The tests showed the beams were safe and Keltbray could start demolition.

To demolish the roof structure six excavators were craned up onto the roof to break up the concrete structure into chunks weighing no more than 16 tonnes. These were then lifted off with the tower crane. The 23rd floor has been particularly heavy work to break up as it is made up from a very heavy slab (see box).

Keltbray has now virtually demolished the roof structure so the job should become more straightforward, although O鈥橲ullivan points out the core is particularly substantial.

The building should be down by Christmas. Mace will start putting in secant piles around the perimeter of the site to form the basement in August, and Keltbray will clear out the raft foundation under the tower and excavate the new basement ready for Mace to start on the Walkie-talkie 鈥� hopefully later next year.