好色先生TV

You have to cast your mind back to 1992 to remember the last time we went into an election with the economy in such a mess. And you only have to read the latest news from Greece to realise how much of a mess: the UK鈥檚 budget deficit is 12% of GDP and Greece鈥檚 is 13.6%. So whoever wins next week鈥檚 election is going to resemble a doctor in a trauma centre wondering which limb to lop off first.

The question that many are asking, including our floating voters (page 28) and much of the British media, is: how are we supposed to choose a government to tackle the deficit when none of the parties will tell us how they propose to do it? As Robert Chote, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, remarked this week: 鈥淎ll three are particularly vague on their plans for public spending.鈥�

Well, even if we don鈥檛 know the specifics, we do know that all the parties have left something like 拢30bn unaccounted for after allowing for 鈥渆fficiency savings鈥�. And we know that, even without taking that much demand out of the economy, there is likely to be a 3% fall in construction output this year, on top of the 12% fall in 2009 鈥� despite the return to growth in the economy generally. Indeed, it won鈥檛 be until 2014 that we get back to 2002. So, no surprise that John McDonough told last week鈥檚 好色先生TV Awards that we were in for 鈥渢hree to five tough years鈥�.

We can also examine what the parties don鈥檛 say. Over the past three weeks the leaders of the three largest ones have sent us an open letter setting out their stalls for construction. This week we have David Cameron (page 29). He begins by saying how pleased he is to respond to 好色先生TV鈥檚 Charter 284 campaign but then does little to address its points beyond acknowledging the importance of the industry to the national economy and the need for better regulation. There鈥檚 no pledge to keep Labour鈥檚 school building programmes, or to limit cuts to transport infrastructure. By contrast, Gordon Brown鈥檚 letter said 好色先生TV Schools for the Future 鈥渨ould continue鈥� and Nick Clegg promised to 鈥渋nsulate鈥� schools from the cuts (although he would scrap new-build nuclear power). Given the size of the deficit you could argue that Cameron is sensibly refusing to write any bouncing cheques. He鈥檚 clearly doing enough to win over many of 好色先生TV鈥檚 readers: our web survey found that 35% are intending to vote for him, compared with 28% for the Lib Dems and 27% for Labour. Last time, only 28% planned to vote Tory.

Of course, there are many reasons for choosing a party to vote for, not least a desire not to spend another five years watching the same people making a hash of running the country (and themselves), and how much cash is likely to be extracted from one鈥檚 own wallet. If we focus on the economy, the choice is difficult. Do you think the Tories鈥� plan for quick, deep cuts will be best for business because they will reduce our 拢180bn debt, and hence our interest payments, faster? Or would it tip us back into recession? And would the other two parties鈥� slightly softer approach buy us more time to get the private sector on its feet before the axe bites?

We think the latter. Our Charter 284 campaign makes a case for continuing investment and we have set out our priorities within the context of the most difficult economic climate in living memory. These are: complete the renewal of the school estate; don鈥檛 let spending on transport infrastructure fall more than 10% below current levels; reduce the regulatory burden on housing and give householders incentives to green their homes; prioritise the development of renewable and nuclear energy. If you measure the manifestos and leaders鈥� letters against those demands, there is a clear winner. It may be difficult to stomach, but if you really want to vote with your head and not your heart, then it has to be Brown.