好色先生TV

The answer is threefold. First, the basis of the operation is unclear. Is Montbretia, the firm in question, a conventional agency, or is it the representative of a group of eastern European contractors? Second, there is the issue of pay. Montbretia says wages will be lower for eastern European subcontractors than British ones. At a time when skills shortages are driving up rates, not many contractors are ideologically opposed to that 鈥� but the unions are. Fervently. And finally, firms are uneasy about employing foreign labour. Language barriers and different working practices make site life more difficult, and can fatally compromise safety. Montbretia is attempting to allay concerns by guaranteeing that workers come with a construction skills cards, safety training and an English-speaking foreman. Contractors are sceptical.

Construction has been avoiding facing up to the issues of immigrant labour for years. The truth is that workers from east and central Europe 鈥� many of them illegal 鈥� have saved the industry over the past decade. Like the NHS and a million coffee shops, construction needs foreign labour, but it doesn鈥檛 necessarily want them. That鈥檚 not an attitude born out of xenophobia, but the difficulty of making it all work. Without internationally recognised qualifications, internationally recognised safety signage or a test for linguistic competence, it is all rather a struggle.

Workload is increasing. There is no cavalry of newly qualified apprentices coming over the hill 鈥� although there could be 40,000 economic immigrants coming into Britain each year after enlargement. Construction needs to establish how best to harness this opportunity while ensuring the welfare of the migrants. As Barry Stephens of the National Federation of Builders says in his letter (page 32), there is a desperate need 鈥渇or a clear strategy of welcoming foreign workers into the industry鈥�. Like it or not, construction is now part of the global marketplace.