May I add to the comments made in Geoff Arnold鈥檚 letter on behalf of the UK Timber Frame Association (12 March, page 26)?

The statement that six persons died in a timber-frame building in Peckham was incorrect (the few fires reported in timber-frame houses have, as in Peckham, almost all occurred during construction and before occupation), but the statement that insurers could pull cover for timber-frame houses (12 March, page 29) is equally alarmist. The insurance industry would be unlikely to want to lose 75% of their new house business in Scotland 鈥� that is the percentage of new dwellings that are timber frame. Timber-frame buildings have to meet exactly the same stringent fire safety regulations as other building methods.

May I suggest you at least check with UKTFA in the future before publishing such alarmist stories 鈥� and take note that UKTFA has initiated its SiteSafe campaign and has worked closely with BRE and fire authorities throughout its existence, as have all its members.

Ian Scott-Watson, The Border Design Centre

Postscript

What do you think? If you have views on anything published in 好色先生TV, write to: The editor, 好色先生TV, 3rd floor, Ludgate House, 245 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 9UY. Fax: 020-7560 4004. Email: building@ubm.com. We may edit letters.

Topics