All that cash is certainly giving investors faith in the industry鈥檚 future. The Construction Products Association calculates that, before an extra penny is allocated, public sector work will leap 7.6% a year between 2002 and 2004 (page 18). But these are just numbers. The CPA warns: 鈥淎 number of areas of concern remain over the government鈥檚 ability to deliver.鈥� No kidding. In housing, stock transfers have flopped, the 拢1bn Colchester barracks PFI is two years late, and only two PFI hospitals deals were signed in one nine-month period. It鈥檚 all so, so slow.
The reasons for delay 鈥� planning problems, shortages of client project managers and controversy over the PFI 鈥� are well rehearsed. But the real failure is one of leadership. When Sir Steve Robson was at the Treasury, Whitehall and the industry were driven into deals by wider political imperatives. But momentum has been lost since his departure. Is it any wonder that the billions pouring into the NHS are being siphoned off in doctors鈥� pay deals, such as the one giving 30-year-old consultants 拢78,000 a year? There aren鈥檛 enough alternatives coming from the capital works crew.
The penny must drop sooner or later, though, which may lead to a sudden deluge of tenders 鈥� there鈥檚 already talk of 21 PFI hospitals being let in 2003. If the industry can鈥檛 then handle the work, at least the politicians will be able to line up contractors as the fall guys. But there is still time (just) to avert unsavoury 鈥渂ungling builder鈥� headlines and save Blair鈥檚 bacon. The new-look Cabinet Office may sharpen Whitehall鈥檚 lacklustre approach to project management. But there鈥檚 also a case for a high-profile public services taskforce to get spending departments moving up through the gears. They鈥檒l need a figurehead, of course, and it鈥檚 hard to think of anyone more suitable than that great hammer of the mandarins, Sir John Egan.
The labours of Livingstone
Not only is London out of all proportion to other UK cities, but its population has grown since 1989 at an ever accelerating rate. In his draft London plan, Ken Livingstone sets out to create 636,000 new jobs and 459,000 additional homes within 14 years (pages 20-21). The expanses of the Thames Gateway to the east are earmarked for the bulk of this capital growth, with other pockets of major development scattered here and there. Naturally, there are few catches. First, transport must precede development. Second, public subsidies for affordable homes must be raised. And third, the planning system has to get three times faster. Crack these problems, Kenneth, and the construction industry will erect a statue of you outside your GLA HQ 鈥� at cost.
No comments yet