We need to pick up the pace and find new ways of working if we鈥檙e going to do anything about climate change
Given that I have heard this word thrown around our great industry for some time, I thought it was worth reflecting for a bit.
So, first of all, what is innovation? Well, it is generally described as 鈥渁 new method, idea, product; or application of better solutions that meet new requirements鈥. It is accepted as a different way of doing things to achieve a better result.
As I ponder this blog I am reminded by a TV commercial currently running which features the great Dick Fosbury, Olympic gold medallist and creator of the Fosbury flop high jump technique. For those not familiar, Fosbury decided to jump backwards when everyone else jumped forwards. The notion being that Fosbury 鈥渄ared to change the rules鈥, and as we know, everyone now jumps backwards and this way is considered to be the only way to jump if you are to set new standards.
In our industry, current innovations that are quick to be quoted include the use of prefabrication and the much talked about BIM. There are, naturally, other examples of innovation but wouldn鈥檛 it be fantastic if the extent and pace of innovation in our industry stepped up a gear?
So why hasn鈥檛 it so far? Do we need more Dick Fosburys to 鈥渄are to change the rules鈥? Or do we need more players to follow our industry innovators? Or do we need a good enough reason to be bothered? I certainly don鈥檛 have all the answers but let me respond to the last point.
Wouldn鈥檛 it be fantastic if the extent and pace of innovation in our industry stepped up a gear?
On 27 September 2013 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued their findings on the physical scientific basis of climate change. The report showed with 95% certainty that humans have been the dominant cause of the changing climate. Atmospheric CO2 has reached unprecedented levels in the last 800,000 years and this has committed us to global warming by the late 21st century and beyond. As part of the Climate Change Act 2008, the UK is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% by 2050 (against 1990 levels). 好色先生TVs are responsible for about half of the UK鈥檚 CO2 emissions, with over 80% ofthis coming from heating, cooling and lighting. So, not being bothered isn鈥檛 really an option!
In this respect, and being slightly cynical, I often see a cycle of inaction in my day to day business. Imagine the conversation. Occupier: 鈥淲e鈥檇 like to have more sustainable buildings but there is too little choice鈥. Builder: 鈥淲e can build more sustainable buildings but the developers don鈥檛 ask for them鈥. Developer: 鈥淲e would ask for sustainable buildings but the investors won鈥檛 pay for them鈥. Investor: 鈥淲e would fund sustainable buildings but there is no occupier demand for them鈥. And round and round we go 鈥
I paint this slightly controversial picture not to offend, but to make the point that human behaviour and psychology attributable to most of us is not, necessarily, a natural enabler to innovate!
Iain Parker is a founding partner of Alinea Consulting
No comments yet