好色先生TV

About 40% of construction work undertaken in Britain is bought by the taxpayer, compared with 31% in the days when Northern Rock was just a bank with an innovative business model. Unfortunately, while it saves the industry鈥檚 life, the state is also picking its pockets. As we report on page 32, HM Revenue and Customs is being leaned on by the Treasury to make up a 拢41bn fall in the government鈥檚 tax take. Ironically, these measures look likely to mow down many of the survivors.

Construction output, which dropped 11% last year, is forecast to drop another 2% in 2010. What clients there are are taking longer to pay and banks are reluctant to hand out bridging loans. The result is that a hike in National Insurance contributions and a rejection by the Time to Pay scheme may be what David Westwood, the Essex builder interviewed for the article, says is a 鈥渒iller blow鈥�.

The final irony is that HMRC is the creditor most likely to pay the 拢1,500 needed to issue a winding-up petition 鈥� secure in the knowledge that it will be the first to dine on the resulting carcass.

All in all, HMRC鈥檚 measures amount to an onslaught on small firms. On top of the 1.5% hike in employers鈥� NI contributions, anyone who pays their CIS or PAYE payments late will be slapped with fines starting at 1% of the debt, rapidly climbing to 4%. Firms must also get to grips with filing their returns online or face more fines. Pretty soon, they can find their tax bill has gone up an eye-watering 10%. To add insult to injury, the Time to Pay scheme, which was brought in a year ago to take some of the sting out of tax deadlines, is becoming tougher and some suspect may be scrapped altogether. Then there is the threat of VAT rising to 20%, which looks likely to do what the drop to 15% didn鈥檛: make a real difference.

Meanwhile, a National Federation of Builders survey shows that 79% of small firms are finding it harder to win public sector work as it is bundled into large packages and let on frameworks that naturally favour national contractors.

About 40% of construction work is now bought by the taxpayer, compared with 31% in 2007. Unfortunately, while saving the industry鈥檚 life, the state is picking its pockets

Of course, the government must raise money, but squeezing SMEs for this will lead to more redundancies and insolvencies, which means fewer taxpayers and more signers-on 鈥� last week we reported that a third of small firms are thinking about cutting jobs, even before HMRC鈥檚 campaign gets into gear. So, for everyone鈥檚 sake, including its own, the government should give these businesses a break.

Roxane McMeeken, assistant editor

Current accounts

This week鈥檚 announcement on feed-in tariffs should help improve the UK鈥檚 dismally low percentage of power generated from renewable sources. It鈥檚 particularly good news for householders with photovoltaic panels on their roof 鈥� as they will be paid 41p for every electricity unit they send to the grid 鈥� not to mention the firms who make and install them. This equates to a return of 5-8%, which is a lot better than interest rates on savings accounts.

It鈥檚 also straightforward; the days of spending hours filling in low carbon grant applications only to find all the money has run out are over. The only caveat is that householders need to get enough sunshine on their roof to get the promised returns. For others, the news is less exciting. Developers and housebuilders get a lower rate of return, and they remain in the position of paying out for expensive installations just to see the end users reap the benefits. Whether this will translate into higher rental and sales values is a moot point.